You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I looked at the CMakeLists.txt file of the packages, I found that there was no unified specification. Some packages use the original syntax of cmake, some use ament_cmake, and some use ament_cmake_auto, and some even use a mixture of several syntaxes. Will there be a unified cmake writing rules in the future, such as using ament_cmake_auto, or other
type:guidelinesDevelopment, style, or operational guidelines of the project.
1 participant
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
When I looked at the
CMakeLists.txt
file of the packages, I found that there was no unified specification. Some packages use the original syntax ofcmake
, some useament_cmake
, and some useament_cmake_auto
, and some even use a mixture of several syntaxes. Will there be a unified cmake writing rules in the future, such as using ament_cmake_auto, or otherBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions