Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ni 707 add waiting screen #756

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024
Merged

Ni 707 add waiting screen #756

merged 19 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

narayanan-iyer-pfizer
Copy link
Collaborator

By using Archive library, I have refactored the code in code explorer, package explorer to read tarballs in memory

@AARON-CLARK
Copy link
Collaborator

@AARON-CLARK will take a look at tests... And @Jeff-Thompson12 volunteers too!

@Jeff-Thompson12
Copy link
Collaborator

@narayanan-iyer-pfizer I pushed a couple commits that should help you out with dealing with the errors. It seems like the main issue now is that archive is returning a different directory tree than what one would expect if the tarball was unpacked. Mainly the difference is that the directory is no longer being returned in alphabetical order which I think we would want.
image

@narayanan-iyer-pfizer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@narayanan-iyer-pfizer I pushed a couple commits that should help you out with dealing with the errors. It seems like the main issue now is that archive is returning a different directory tree than what one would expect if the tarball was unpacked. Mainly the difference is that the directory is no longer being returned in alphabetical order which I think we would want. image
Thanks ! I have updated code to sort it . Still the tests seems to failing

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.00000% with 9 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.34%. Comparing base (bdcbffc) to head (b1a618d).

Files Patch % Lines
R/mod_code_explorer.R 77.14% 8 Missing ⚠️
R/mod_code_explorer_utils.R 95.45% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #756      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.23%   79.34%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines        5028     5063      +35     
==========================================
+ Hits         3984     4017      +33     
- Misses       1044     1046       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Jeff-Thompson12 Jeff-Thompson12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@narayanan-iyer-pfizer I love this PR. Few comments:

  • General spacing and formatting of function calls. We don't have a formal style, but all of the other code has consistent spacing (and I personally find it easier to read).
  • Using reactives in a function. I can be swayed on this but I personally think the value of a reactive should be passed in functions and not the reactive itself.

@narayanan-iyer-pfizer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Changes made to address the requests. Tests are still failing , pls take a look.thanks

Copy link
Collaborator

@Jeff-Thompson12 Jeff-Thompson12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@narayanan-iyer-pfizer I am getting some console warnings when viewing help documents in the file explorer. Can you take a look?

image

@narayanan-iyer-pfizer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@narayanan-iyer-pfizer I am getting some console warnings when viewing help documents in the file explorer. Can you take a look?

image

this has been addressed in a different way

@Jeff-Thompson12
Copy link
Collaborator

@narayanan-iyer-pfizer I am getting some console warnings when viewing help documents in the file explorer. Can you take a look?
image

this has been addressed in a different way

Marvelous. I love it.

@AARON-CLARK did you want to take a look at this PR? My additions were fairly minor, but since I did contribute, I wasn't sure if you wanted an additional pair of eyes on it.

@Jeff-Thompson12 Jeff-Thompson12 self-requested a review March 12, 2024 12:58
@AARON-CLARK
Copy link
Collaborator

did you want to take a look at this PR?

Normally, No! I trust you. But I had a minute so I just pulled it open to test anyway (lol). The source explorer is lightning fast now! Great work @narayanan-iyer-pfizer! And thanks @Jeff-Thompson12 for contributing.

@AARON-CLARK AARON-CLARK merged commit c08b273 into dev Mar 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@jthompson-arcus jthompson-arcus deleted the ni-707-add-waiting-screen branch June 12, 2024 12:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants