Update SCOPE.md with Intergenerational Feature Compatibility #6325
+1
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Bassoonian
reviewed
Feb 23, 2025
pkmnsnfrn
approved these changes
Feb 23, 2025
|
Is there a reason this needs to abide the freeze? It targets master, after all |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Discussed on Discord, this doesn't change anything pertaining to the scope doc functionality, but it gives us a category / label we can use when discussing features that was missing before.
This category is for PRs that fix problems that exist due to the unique nature of expansion as a project that integrates all features from all games into one GBA cartridge, which encounters limitations both due to the difference in hardware and gaps of support in how new generation content interacts with no-longer-used old generation features. It's in the "Discussion Required" section because many of these implementations and fixes will be subjective, and thus benefit from senate consensus.
Just formally adding this to the doc after the discussion.
Discord contact info
@Pawkkie