reformat table for clarity - no spec change

Author: tariqkurd-repo

src/level-ext.adoc

@@ -125,17 +125,14 @@ NOTE: if W=0 or C=0 then SL is irrelevant
 .{cheri_levels_ext_name} `LVLBITS=1` summary table for loaded capabilities
 [#cap_level_load_summary,width="100%",options=header,align=center,cols="1,1,1,1,1,1,6"]
 |==============================================================================
-   4+|Auth cap field             2+| Data cap field |
-    h|*R*   h|*C* h|*EL* h|*CL*   h| Tag h| Sealed h|Action
-.5+.^|1 .5+.^| 1   | 1 .3+.^| X    | X    | X  .2+.^|Load data capability unmodified
-              .4+.^| 0             | 0    | N/A
-                              .3+.^| 1    | Yes     |Load data capability with `CL=min(auth.CL, data.CL)`, EL unchanged
-                          | 1        .2+.^| No      |Load data capability with EL=0, CL unchanged
-                          | 0                       |Load data capability with CL=0, EL=0
+   4+|Auth cap field           2+| Data cap field |
+    h|*R*   h|*C* h|*EL* h|*CL* h| Tag h| Sealed h|Action
+.3+.^|1 .3+.^| 1 .3+.^| 0  | X    .3+.^| 1    | Yes     |Load data capability with `CL=min(auth.CL, data.CL)`, EL unchanged
+                           | 1           .2+.^| No      |Load data capability with EL=0, CL unchanged
+                           | 0                          |Load data capability with CL=0, EL=0
+   6+| All other cases                                  |Load data capability unmodified
 |==============================================================================
 
-NOTE: if R=0 or C=0 then EL and CL are irrelevant
-
 [#section_ext_cheri_multiple_levels]
 === Extending {cheri_levels_ext_name} to more than two levels
 When `LVLBITS>1`, the behaviour of <<ACPERM>> can no longer use masking to adjust the <<section_cap_level>> or <<sl_perm>>, but instead must perform an integer minimum operation on those `LVLBITS`-wide fields.