We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The furcula macros seem to be unnecessary because anything that could be done with them could be done with more idiomatic expressions.
the macros in question include:
-< , -<:p The Furcula, Parallel Furcula -<< , -<<:p The Trystero Furcula, Parallel Trystero Furcula -<>< , -<><:p The Diamond Fishing Rod, Parallel Diamond Fishing Rod
Confirm the equivalence of the behavior of these macros with more idiomatic expressions.
For example, a call to
(-< (+ 1 2) (list 2) (list 3) (list 4)))
Should produce the same value as
(map (fn [x] (list (+ 1 2) (first x))) [(list 1) (list 2) (list 3)])
Write test that demonstrate more idiomatic expressions can accomplish results.
Compare the output with the result of the expression that is supposed to produce the same value
If the tests pass, then mark the macros as deprecated
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The furcula macros seem to be unnecessary because anything that could be done with them could be done with more idiomatic expressions.
the macros in question include:
Confirm the equivalence of the behavior of these macros with more idiomatic expressions.
For example, a call to
Should produce the same value as
Write test that demonstrate more idiomatic expressions can accomplish results.
Compare the output with the result of the expression that is supposed to produce the same value
If the tests pass, then mark the macros as deprecated
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: