feat: implement artifact tool in TS #328
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: e5ec77a The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
.changeset/modern-cars-travel.md (1)
1-5: LGTM! Changeset file structure is correct.The changeset file is properly formatted with the correct metadata and description sections. The "patch" version bump is appropriate for adding a new feature without breaking changes.
Consider expanding the change description to provide more context about the artifact tool's functionality and benefits. For example:
-feat: implement artifact tool in TS +feat: implement artifact tool in TS for improved artifact management + +This new tool provides functionality to create, read, update, and delete artifacts, +enhancing the overall workflow and maintainability of the project.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-message/chat-tools.tsx (2)
24-25: LGTM: New case for artifact handling.The new case for handling artifact data is implemented correctly and follows the existing pattern in the component. This addition successfully expands the functionality of the
ChatToolscomponent.Consider adding type checking for
toolOutput.outputbefore passing it to theArtifactcomponent to ensure type safety. For example:case "artifact": if (typeof toolOutput.output === 'object' && toolOutput.output !== null) { return <Artifact data={toolOutput.output} />; } return null;This would prevent potential runtime errors if
toolOutput.outputis not of the expected type.
5-5: Consider documenting the process for adding new tool outputs.The addition of the artifact case demonstrates how new tool outputs can be integrated into the
ChatToolscomponent. Given the TODO comment and the component's structure, it's clear that more tool outputs might be added in the future.To facilitate future additions and maintain consistency:
- Consider creating a separate file that exports an object mapping tool names to their respective components. This would allow for easier addition of new tools without modifying the switch statement.
- Document the process for adding new tool outputs, including any necessary steps for type definitions, component creation, and integration into the
ChatToolscomponent.- If the number of tool outputs is expected to grow significantly, consider implementing a more scalable solution, such as a registry pattern or dynamic imports.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/tabs.tsx (2)
9-22: LGTM: TabsList component is well-implementedThe TabsList component is correctly implemented using React.forwardRef, properly applies styling, and handles additional props. The displayName is also set correctly.
Consider adding a type annotation for the
classNameprop for better type safety:->(({ className, ...props }, ref) => ( +>(({ className, ...props }: { className?: string }, ref) => (
24-37: LGTM: TabsTrigger component is well-implemented with comprehensive stylingThe TabsTrigger component is correctly implemented using React.forwardRef, applies extensive styling for various states, and handles additional props. The displayName is also set correctly.
Consider breaking down the long className string for better readability:
const tabsTriggerStyles = cn( "inline-flex items-center justify-center whitespace-nowrap rounded-md px-3 py-1 text-sm font-medium", "ring-offset-background transition-all", "focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2", "disabled:pointer-events-none disabled:opacity-50", "data-[state=active]:bg-background data-[state=active]:text-foreground data-[state=active]:shadow", className ); // Then use it in the component className={tabsTriggerStyles}This approach makes the styles more manageable and easier to modify in the future.
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/index.ts (1)
47-49: LGTM: ArtifactTool is correctly added to the toolFactory.The implementation of the artifact tool in the toolFactory is consistent with other tools and correctly uses the imported ArtifactTool and ArtifactToolParams.
For consistency with other tool implementations, consider using a more specific type for the config parameter:
- artifact: async (config: unknown) => { - return [new ArtifactTool(config as ArtifactToolParams)]; + artifact: async (config: ArtifactToolParams) => { + return [new ArtifactTool(config)]; },This change would make the type checking more explicit and consistent with other tool implementations in the factory.
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts (3)
88-89: Enhancement: Provide Detailed Error Message for Missing API KeyThe error message
"E2B_API_KEY is not set"could be more informative to guide the user on resolving the issue.Suggested change:
if (!this.apiKey) { - throw new Error("E2B_API_KEY is not set"); + throw new Error("E2B_API_KEY is not set. Please set the E2B_API_KEY environment variable or pass the apiKey parameter to the constructor."); }
95-100: Error Handling: Logging Errors Before SwallowingIn the
callmethod, errors are caught and an empty object is returned without logging the error. This can make debugging difficult.Consider logging the error before returning, to aid in debugging.
Suggested change:
} catch (error) { + console.error("Error in ArtifactTool.call:", error); return {}; }
40-51: Type Definition:ArtifactShould Use Optional Properties Where AppropriateSome properties in the
Artifacttype, such asinstall_dependencies_commandandport, may not always be required.Consider marking optional properties with
?to reflect their optional nature.Suggested change:
export type Artifact = { commentary: string; template: string; title: string; description: string; additional_dependencies: string[]; has_additional_dependencies: boolean; - install_dependencies_command: string; - port: number | null; + install_dependencies_command?: string; + port?: number; file_path: string; code: string; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- .changeset/modern-cars-travel.md (1 hunks)
- helpers/tools.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/index.ts (2 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/express/package.json (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-message/chat-tools.tsx (2 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/tabs.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (7)
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/index.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/express/package.json (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-message/chat-tools.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/tabs.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/package.json (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (14)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-message/chat-tools.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: Import statement for Artifact component.The import statement for the
Artifactcomponent is correctly placed and necessary for the new functionality added to theChatToolscomponent.templates/types/streaming/express/package.json (1)
26-26: Version update for @e2b/code-interpreter packageThe version of
@e2b/code-interpreterhas been updated from^0.0.5to0.0.9-beta.3. This change has the following implications:
- The new version is pinned to a specific beta release, removing the flexibility for patch updates that the caret (^) notation previously allowed.
- As a beta version, it may introduce new features but could potentially be less stable than the previous version.
- Both versions are in the 0.x range, indicating the package is still in early development and may have breaking changes between minor versions.
Please ensure that:
- This version update aligns with the project's requirements and stability needs.
- The changes in the beta version have been reviewed and are compatible with your current implementation.
- Thorough testing is performed to verify that the new version doesn't introduce any regressions or unexpected behavior.
To help with verification, you can run the following script to check for any usage of
@e2b/code-interpreterin your codebase:This will help you identify the files that need to be checked for compatibility with the new version.
✅ Verification successful
Consistent Version Update for @e2b/code-interpreter
All instances of
@e2b/code-interpreterin yourpackage.jsonfiles have been consistently updated to version0.0.9-beta.3. This ensures uniformity across the codebase where the package is utilized.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usage of @e2b/code-interpreter in the codebase # Search for import statements or require calls rg --type typescript --type javascript "(@e2b/code-interpreter|from\s+['\"]@e2b/code-interpreter['\"])" # Search for any other mentions of the package name rg "@e2b/code-interpreter"Length of output: 622
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract versions of @e2b/code-interpreter from all package.json files # Find all package.json files containing @e2b/code-interpreter and extract their versions fd package.json | xargs -I{} sh -c "echo '{}:' && jq -r '.dependencies[\"@e2b/code-interpreter\"] // .devDependencies[\"@e2b/code-interpreter\"]' {}"Length of output: 301
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/package.json (2)
20-20: New UI component library added:@radix-ui/react-tabsA new dependency
@radix-ui/react-tabs(version^1.1.0) has been added to the project. This is a UI component library for creating accessible tab interfaces.Please ensure that:
- This new dependency is necessary for the project.
- It's being used effectively in the codebase.
- The caret version (
^1.1.0) aligns with the project's versioning strategy.
14-14: Verify compatibility with the updated@e2b/code-interpreterversionThe
@e2b/code-interpreterpackage has been updated from^0.0.5to a specific beta version0.0.9-beta.3. This change might introduce breaking changes or new features.Please ensure that:
- The application is compatible with this new version.
- Any new features or changes in the beta version are properly utilized.
- Comprehensive testing is performed to catch any potential issues.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/tabs.tsx (4)
1-7: LGTM: Imports and Tabs component look goodThe "use client" directive is correctly placed, imports are appropriate, and the Tabs component is a simple and effective implementation using Radix UI's TabsPrimitive.Root.
39-52: LGTM: TabsContent component is well-implemented with focus on accessibilityThe TabsContent component is correctly implemented using React.forwardRef, applies appropriate styling with a focus on visibility for accessibility, and handles additional props. The displayName is also set correctly.
54-54: LGTM: Export statement is correct and comprehensiveThe export statement correctly includes all the necessary components: Tabs, TabsContent, TabsList, and TabsTrigger.
1-54: Great job on implementing the tabbed interface components!This file provides a well-structured and comprehensive implementation of a tabbed interface using Radix UI's Tabs primitives. The code follows best practices, including:
- Proper use of React.forwardRef for all components.
- Consistent styling approach using the cn utility function.
- Correct implementation of Next.js Client Components with the "use client" directive.
- Clear and concise exports of all necessary components.
The components are flexible, allowing for additional props and custom styling, which enhances their reusability. The focus on accessibility in the TabsContent component is particularly commendable.
Overall, this is a high-quality implementation that should integrate well into the project and provide a solid foundation for building tabbed interfaces.
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/index.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement for ArtifactTool is correctly added.The import statement for
ArtifactToolandArtifactToolParamsfollows the established pattern in the file and is appropriately placed with other imports.
Line range hint
1-68: Summary: ArtifactTool successfully integrated into the toolFactory.The changes to this file effectively integrate the new ArtifactTool into the existing toolFactory. The implementation is consistent with other tools, and the changes are well-structured. The new tool can now be created alongside other tools when requested.
To ensure the new tool functions as expected:
This script will help identify any places where the new ArtifactTool is being used or configured, which can be useful for further testing and verification.
✅ Verification successful
ArtifactTool Integration Verified
The ArtifactTool is correctly integrated into the
toolFactoryand defined appropriately within the codebase. No issues were found with its implementation or usage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the ArtifactTool is being used in the codebase # Search for usage of ArtifactTool or artifact configuration rg --type typescript -e "ArtifactTool" -e "artifact.*config" -g "!**/index.ts"Length of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the ArtifactTool is being used in the codebase # Search for usage of ArtifactTool or artifact configuration rg -e "ArtifactTool" -e "artifact.*config" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "!**/index.ts"Length of output: 420
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (4)
1-14: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and relevant.The imports are logically structured, with external libraries followed by local components. All imported items appear to be used in the component, contributing to its functionality.
16-32: LGTM: Type definitions are comprehensive and well-structured.The
Artifacttype provides a detailed structure for artifact data, whileArtifactPropsoffers flexibility with optional properties. These type definitions enhance code readability and type safety.
34-86: LGTM: Overall component structure and implementation.The Artifact component is well-structured and implements the required functionality effectively. It handles cases where data might be missing and provides a clear interface for viewing artifact details.
74-80: Review iframe sandbox attributes for security.The current sandbox attributes for the iframe are:
sandbox="allow-forms allow-scripts allow-same-origin"While these attributes provide some security, consider if all are necessary for your use case. In particular,
allow-same-origincan potentially allow the iframe content to access the parent page's DOM, which might not be desirable.Consider reviewing and potentially restricting these attributes further based on your specific requirements and security needs.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/shared.ts (1)
1-2: Consider using 'node:' prefix for 'fs' importFor consistency with the 'path' import and to explicitly indicate that it's a Node.js built-in module, consider updating the 'fs' import to use the 'node:' prefix.
-import fs from "fs"; +import fs from "node:fs"; import path from "node:path";templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
230-233: Consider using a more robust key for list items.Currently, the log content is being used as the key for list items. This could potentially cause issues if the logs are not unique. Consider using an index or a combination of index and log content for a more robust key:
{logs.map((log, index) => ( <li key={`${index}-${log.substring(0, 10)}`}> <code>{log}</code> </li> ))}This approach ensures unique keys even if log contents are duplicated, improving the reliability of React's reconciliation process.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/shared.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/express/package.json (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts
- templates/types/streaming/express/package.json
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/shared.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/shared.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM: Constant definition is appropriateThe constant
TOOL_OUTPUT_DIRis well-defined and follows naming conventions. Exporting it allows for easy reuse and modification if needed.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (3)
1-38: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are well-structured.The imports and type definitions in this section are clear, comprehensive, and appropriate for the component's functionality. The structure provides a solid foundation for the rest of the implementation.
150-170: LGTM: CodeSandboxPreview component is well-implemented.The CodeSandboxPreview component is well-structured and includes good security practices with the use of the
sandboxattribute. The loading indicator provides a good user experience. No issues found in this implementation.
198-225: LGTM: ArtifactLogs component is well-structured.The ArtifactLogs component is implemented effectively. It properly checks for the existence and length of logs before rendering, and provides a clear structure for displaying both stderr and stdout logs. No issues found in this implementation.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-message/chat-tools.tsx (2 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-message/index.tsx (4 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-messages.tsx (3 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/artifact.ts
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-message/chat-tools.tsx
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-message/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-messages.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-message/index.tsx (5)
40-40: LGTM: NewartifactVersionprop added correctlyThe
artifactVersionprop has been added to theChatMessageContentcomponent with the appropriate type definition. This change aligns with the PR objectives and is implemented correctly.Also applies to: 46-46
109-111: LGTM:artifactVersionprop correctly passed toChatToolsThe
ChatToolscomponent now receives theartifactVersionprop when rendered. This change is implemented correctly and maintains the existing conditional rendering logic.
149-149: LGTM:artifactVersionprop added toChatMessagecomponentThe
artifactVersionprop has been correctly added to theChatMessagecomponent with the appropriate type definition. This change is consistent with the modifications made toChatMessageContent.Also applies to: 155-155
167-167: LGTM:artifactVersionprop correctly passed toChatMessageContentThe
artifactVersionprop is properly passed fromChatMessagetoChatMessageContent, ensuring correct prop propagation through the component hierarchy.
Line range hint
1-182: VerifyartifactVersionusage inChatToolscomponentThe changes to add the
artifactVersionprop throughout the component hierarchy look good. To ensure complete implementation, it would be beneficial to verify that theChatToolscomponent correctly utilizes theartifactVersionprop.Run the following script to check the implementation of
ChatTools:✅ Verification successful
Update Shell Script to Correct Type Specification
The previous script failed because
rgdoes not recognize the file typetypescript. Please run the updated script below, which correctly specifies the TypeScript file types.
Retry Shell Script Without
--typeFlagsThe previous script failed because
rgdid not recognize the specified file types. Please run the updated script below, which uses explicit file extensions to search within TypeScript files.
artifactVersion Prop Correctly Implemented in ChatTools Component
The
artifactVersionprop has been successfully added and is correctly utilized within theChatToolscomponent. No issues were found during verification.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of ChatTools component # Test: Search for the ChatTools component definition rg --type typescript -A 10 'function ChatTools' # Test: Check for artifactVersion usage within ChatTools rg --type typescript 'artifactVersion' --glob 'chat-tools*'Length of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of ChatTools component # Test: Search for the ChatTools component definition rg --type tsx -A 10 'function ChatTools' # Test: Check for artifactVersion usage within ChatTools rg --type ts --type tsx 'artifactVersion' --glob 'chat-tools*'Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of ChatTools component # Test: Search for the ChatTools component definition in .ts and .tsx files rg 'function ChatTools' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' -A 10 # Test: Check for artifactVersion usage within ChatTools in .ts and .tsx files rg 'artifactVersion' --glob 'chat-tools*.ts' --glob 'chat-tools*.tsx'Length of output: 1646
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-messages.tsx (1)
97-97: PassingartifactVersionprop toChatMessageis appropriateThe
artifactVersionprop is correctly passed to theChatMessagecomponent, allowing it to access the corresponding artifact version for each message.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-messages.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-input.tsx (3)
Line range hint
58-64: LGTM: Improved onSubmit function with annotation handling.The changes to the
onSubmitfunction are well-implemented. Preventing the default form submission and handling annotations separately improve the component's functionality.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
reset()call after handling annotations. This would improve code readability:if (annotations.length) { handleSubmitWithAnnotations(e, annotations); reset(); // Reset file-related state after submitting with annotations return; }
81-86: LGTM: New handleKeyDown function improves UX.The addition of the
handleKeyDownfunction is a great improvement to the user experience. It allows users to submit messages using the Enter key without Shift, which is a common expectation in chat interfaces.Consider adding a check for empty input to prevent submitting blank messages:
const handleKeyDown = (e: React.KeyboardEvent<HTMLTextAreaElement>) => { if (e.key === "Enter" && !e.shiftKey && props.input.trim()) { e.preventDefault(); onSubmit(e as unknown as React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>); } };
108-116: LGTM: Textarea component replaces Input for improved functionality.The replacement of the Input component with a Textarea component is a good improvement, allowing for multi-line input as mentioned in the AI summary. The addition of the
onKeyDownprop correctly implements the new key handling functionality.Consider using a more flexible approach for the Textarea height:
-className="flex-1 min-h-0 h-[40px]" +className="flex-1 min-h-[40px] max-h-[200px] overflow-y-auto resize-y"This change would allow the Textarea to grow with content up to a maximum height, providing a better user experience for longer messages while maintaining a compact initial size.
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/code-generator.ts (2)
1-37: LGTM! Consider adding version comments for templates.The imports and the
CODE_GENERATION_PROMPTconstant are well-structured and provide clear instructions for artifact generation. The inclusion of multiple templates adds flexibility to the tool.Consider adding version comments for each template in the
CODE_GENERATION_PROMPT. This would make it easier to track and update specific templates in the future. For example:// Template versions: // 1. code-interpreter-multilang: v1.0 // 2. nextjs-developer: v14.2.5 // 3. vue-developer: v3.13.0 // 4. streamlit-developer: v1.0 // 5. gradio-developer: v1.0 const CODE_GENERATION_PROMPT = `...`;
39-81: LGTM! Consider using plural form for consistency.The type definitions and
DEFAULT_META_DATAconstant are well-structured and provide a solid foundation for the code generator tool.For consistency, consider using the plural form "CodeGeneratorParameters" for the type name, as it's used in the plural form in
DEFAULT_META_DATA:export type CodeGeneratorParameters = { requirement: string; oldCode?: string; }; // Update usage in other places, e.g.: export type CodeGeneratorToolParams = { metadata?: ToolMetadata<JSONSchemaType<CodeGeneratorParameters>>; }; const DEFAULT_META_DATA: ToolMetadata<JSONSchemaType<CodeGeneratorParameters>> = { // ... };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/code-generator.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/api/chat/route.ts (2 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-input.tsx (4 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/code-generator.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/api/chat/route.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-input.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (13)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/api/chat/route.ts (3)
10-11: LGTM: New function import added correctly.The
retrieveLatestArtifactfunction is imported correctly from the appropriate module.
63-71: LGTM: New artifact retrieval logic integrated correctly.The
latestArtifactis retrieved and passed toconvertMessageContentappropriately. The changes are well-integrated into the existing code structure.
Line range hint
1-124: Summary: Artifact retrieval functionality successfully implemented.The changes introduce a new
retrieveLatestArtifactfunction and integrate it into the existing chat processing logic. This enhancement allows for the incorporation of the latest artifact in the message content conversion process, potentially providing more context for the chat engine's operations.The implementation is clean, well-integrated, and maintains the existing error handling and response generation logic. These changes should improve the chat functionality without introducing any apparent issues.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/chat-input.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.The addition of the React import and the Textarea component import are appropriate for the changes made in this file. These imports support the transition from using an Input component to a Textarea component as mentioned in the AI summary.
Also applies to: 6-6
Line range hint
67-71: LGTM: Improved file upload handling.The addition of the alert for multiple file uploads is a good UX improvement. It clearly communicates the single file upload limitation to the user, aligning with the requirements mentioned in the AI summary.
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/code-generator.ts (4)
83-88: LGTM! Class definition and constructor are well-implemented.The
CodeGeneratorToolclass is correctly defined, implementing theBaseToolinterface. The constructor properly initializes the metadata with either the provided values or the default metadata.
1-129: Overall, well-implemented CodeGeneratorTool with room for enhancements.The
CodeGeneratorToolimplementation is generally well-structured and follows good practices. It provides a solid foundation for generating code artifacts based on user requirements.Key points for improvement:
- Add version comments for templates in
CODE_GENERATION_PROMPT.- Use plural form "CodeGeneratorParameters" for consistency.
- Enhance error handling in the
callmethod with more detailed error information.- Improve robustness and security in the
generateArtifactmethod:
- Implement input validation
- Use type guards for response structure
- Enhance JSON parsing and validation
- Improve error logging
Implementing these suggestions will further improve the tool's reliability, maintainability, and security.
90-100: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove error handling in the
callmethod.I acknowledge the existing comment about providing more informative error responses. In addition to that suggestion, consider adding type narrowing for the error object to provide more specific error information.
Here's an example of how you could improve the error handling:
async call(input: CodeGeneratorParameter) { try { const artifact = await this.generateArtifact( input.requirement, input.oldCode, ); return artifact as JSONValue; } catch (error) { if (error instanceof Error) { return { isError: true, message: error.message, name: error.name }; } return { isError: true, message: 'An unknown error occurred' }; } }This approach provides more detailed error information when possible, while still handling cases where the caught error might not be an instance of
Error.
102-127: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance robustness and security in the
generateArtifactmethod.I acknowledge the existing comments about handling potential undefined properties in the response message and improving the robustness of JSON parsing. In addition to those suggestions, consider the following improvements:
- Use a type guard to ensure the response has the expected structure.
- Implement input validation for the
queryandoldCodeparameters.- Use a more secure logging approach.
Here's an example of how you could implement these improvements:
async generateArtifact( query: string, oldCode?: string, ): Promise<CodeArtifact> { if (typeof query !== 'string' || query.trim() === '') { throw new Error('Invalid query: Query must be a non-empty string'); } if (oldCode !== undefined && typeof oldCode !== 'string') { throw new Error('Invalid oldCode: Must be a string if provided'); } const userMessage = ` ${query} ${oldCode ? `The existing code is: \n\`\`\`${oldCode}\`\`\`` : ""} `; const messages: ChatMessage[] = [ { role: "system", content: CODE_GENERATION_PROMPT }, { role: "user", content: userMessage }, ]; try { const response = await Settings.llm.chat({ messages }); if (!response || typeof response !== 'object' || !('message' in response) || typeof response.message !== 'object' || !('content' in response.message)) { throw new Error('Invalid response structure from LLM'); } const content = response.message.content?.toString() ?? ''; const jsonContent = content .replace(/^```json\s*|\s*```$/g, "") .replace(/^`+|`+$/g, "") .trim(); let artifact: CodeArtifact; try { artifact = JSON.parse(jsonContent) as CodeArtifact; // Validate that artifact has all required properties if (!isValidCodeArtifact(artifact)) { throw new Error('Invalid CodeArtifact structure'); } } catch (parseError) { throw new Error('Failed to parse JSON content: ' + (parseError instanceof Error ? parseError.message : String(parseError))); } return artifact; } catch (error) { console.error("Failed to generate artifact:", error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)); throw error; } } // Add this helper function to validate the CodeArtifact structure function isValidCodeArtifact(artifact: any): artifact is CodeArtifact { return ( typeof artifact === 'object' && artifact !== null && typeof artifact.commentary === 'string' && typeof artifact.template === 'string' && typeof artifact.title === 'string' && typeof artifact.description === 'string' && Array.isArray(artifact.additional_dependencies) && typeof artifact.has_additional_dependencies === 'boolean' && typeof artifact.install_dependencies_command === 'string' && (artifact.port === null || typeof artifact.port === 'number') && typeof artifact.file_path === 'string' && typeof artifact.code === 'string' ); }These changes improve input validation, error handling, and type safety throughout the method.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
1-352: Overall, well-implemented Artifact component with room for improvements.The Artifact component and its subcomponents are generally well-structured and functional. Key strengths include:
- Comprehensive type definitions for CodeArtifact and ArtifactResult.
- Good separation of concerns with multiple subcomponents.
- Handling of different output types (code, preview, logs).
Areas for improvement:
- Enhance type safety, especially for the
portproperty andruntimeError.- Refactor DOM manipulations to use React state for better alignment with React principles.
- Improve error handling in the
fetchArtifactResultfunction.- Extract duplicated logic (e.g., runtime error rendering) into separate components.
- Enhance accessibility and user experience, particularly for iframes and long log messages.
Implementing the suggested changes will result in a more robust, maintainable, and user-friendly component.
templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (3)
51-78: LGTM!The
retrieveLatestArtifactfunction is well-implemented and effectively retrieves the latest artifact from the annotations. The reverse iteration ensures the most recent artifact is found efficiently.
83-92: LGTM!The
convertMessageContentfunction correctly incorporates the optionallatestArtifactparameter and appends it to the message content when provided. This enhances the flexibility of message content construction.
97-98: LGTM!The update to
convertAnnotationsallows it to handle optional annotations gracefully, returning an empty array when none are provided. This improves the robustness of the function.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/api/sandbox/route.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/api/sandbox/route.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
311-314: LGTM: Well-implemented image file check function.The
isImageFilefunction is well-implemented. It efficiently checks for common image file extensions and is easily extensible if needed in the future.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
1-14: LGTM: Imports and type definitions look good.The import statements and type definitions are well-organized and appropriate for the component's functionality.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (2)
1-37: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are well-structured.The imports and type definitions are clear, appropriate, and well-organized. The
CodeArtifactandArtifactResulttypes provide a good structure for the data being handled in this component.
1-375: Overall, well-structured component with room for improvements.The Artifact component and its sub-components are well-structured and seem to fulfill their purpose of displaying and managing code artifacts. The code is generally clear and easy to follow. However, there are a few areas for improvement:
- Optimize the useEffect dependency array in the main Artifact component.
- Improve error handling in the fetchArtifactResult function.
- Enhance the file extension extraction logic in the ArtifactOutput component.
- Refactor the layout management to avoid direct DOM manipulation.
- Consider making the isImageFile function more flexible.
Addressing these points will improve the overall code quality, maintainability, and adherence to React best practices.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- helpers/tools.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/index.ts (2 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/express/package.json (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/index.ts
- templates/types/streaming/express/package.json
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/package.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/express/src/routes/chat.route.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/express/src/routes/chat.route.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
templates/types/streaming/express/src/routes/chat.route.ts (2)
20-20: New route added for /sandbox endpointA new POST route for the
/sandboxendpoint has been added, using thesandboxfunction as the handler. This addition follows the existing pattern of route definitions in the file.Let's verify that this is the only occurrence of the /sandbox route:
✅ Verification successful
Verified the uniqueness of the
/sandboxroute. No additional route definitions found outsidechat.route.ts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify uniqueness of /sandbox route # Test: Search for any other occurrences of /sandbox route rg --type typescript '/sandbox' --glob '!**/chat.route.ts'Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify uniqueness of /sandbox route by searching in .ts files excluding chat.route.ts # Test: Search for any other occurrences of /sandbox route in .ts files rg '/sandbox' --glob '*.ts' --glob '!chat.route.ts'Length of output: 186
10-10: New import added for sandbox controllerThe import statement for the
sandboxfunction from the sandbox controller has been correctly added. This follows the existing import style in the file.Let's verify the existence of the sandbox controller:
templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.ts (2)
134-134:⚠️ Potential issueMissing import for 'crypto' module
The
cryptomodule is used at line 134 but is not imported. This will cause aReferenceErrorat runtime.Add the following import statement at the top of the file:
+import crypto from "crypto"; import { CodeInterpreter, ExecutionError,Likely invalid or redundant comment.
109-110: Ensureresult.logscontainsstdoutandstderrAccessing
result.logs.stdoutandresult.logs.stderrassumes thatlogsis defined and contains these properties. Iflogsmight be undefined or have a different structure, this could cause runtime errors.Please verify that
result.logsalways includesstdoutandstderr. If not, include checks or defaults to handle undefined values.
templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
templates/types/streaming/express/index.ts (1)
44-44: LGTM: New route handler for sandbox API.The route handler for the sandbox API is correctly implemented. For consistency with the chat route, consider using a dedicated router for the sandbox functionality.
Consider refactoring the sandbox route to use a dedicated router, similar to the chat route:
-app.use("/api/sandbox", sandbox); +import sandboxRouter from "./src/routes/sandbox.route"; +app.use("/api/sandbox", sandboxRouter);This would require creating a new file
src/routes/sandbox.route.tsand moving the route logic there.templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (2)
Line range hint
37-47: Add null checks for file content and valueIn the
retrieveDocumentIdsfunction, the code assumes thatfile.contentandfile.content.valueare always defined. If either is undefined, it could lead to runtime errors.Consider adding checks to ensure
file.contentandfile.content.valueare present:for (const file of files) { + if (!file.content || !file.content.value) { + continue; + } if (Array.isArray(file.content.value)) { // it's an array, so it's an array of doc IDs ids.push(...file.content.value); } }
95-95: Remove console.log statement in production codeThe
console.logstatement may expose sensitive information and is generally not recommended in production environments.Apply this diff to remove the console log:
- console.log("latestArtifact", toolOutput.output?.code);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- helpers/tools.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (4 hunks)
- templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/events.ts (0 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/express/index.ts (2 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/api/chat/route.ts (3 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/api/sandbox/route.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/events.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/api/chat/route.ts
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/api/sandbox/route.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/express/index.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
templates/types/streaming/express/index.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM: New import statement for sandbox controller.The import statement for the
sandboxcontroller is correctly implemented and follows proper naming conventions.
Line range hint
1-48: Overall changes look good, consider adding error handling.The new sandbox functionality is well-integrated into the existing Express.js server setup. The changes are minimal and don't disrupt the current structure.
To enhance robustness:
- Consider adding error handling for the sandbox route, possibly in the sandbox controller:
app.use("/api/sandbox", (req, res, next) => { sandbox(req, res, next).catch(next); });
- You might want to add logging for the new sandbox route, similar to how you log for other routes.
To ensure the sandbox controller is properly implemented, you can run the following command:
This will help verify that the sandbox controller is correctly implemented and exported.
✅ Verification successful
Sandbox controller is correctly implemented and exported.
The
sandbox.controller.tsfile exists at./templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.tsand correctly exports thesandboxfunction as expected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the sandbox controller implementation # Test: Check if the sandbox controller file exists and exports a function ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export const sandbox = $_' ./src/controllers/sandbox.controller.tsLength of output: 193
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the sandbox.controller.ts file in the repository fd 'sandbox\.controller\.ts' . --type fLength of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the sandbox controller exports the 'sandbox' function # Test: Check if the sandbox controller file exports a 'sandbox' function ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export const sandbox = $_' ./templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.tsLength of output: 7785
templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.ts (5)
1-24: LGTM: File header and imports are well-structured.The file header includes appropriate copyright and license information. The imports are relevant to the functionality described in the summary and seem complete for the implementation.
38-49: LGTM: Constants and ExecutionResult type are well-defined.The constants for sandbox timeout and max duration provide clear limits for execution. The ExecutionResult type is comprehensive and accurately represents the expected output of code execution.
106-112: LGTM: JSON.stringify issue resolvedThe previous issue with redundant
JSON.stringifywhen usingres.json()has been resolved. The response is now correctly formatted without double serialization.Also applies to: 114-118
121-141: LGTM: downloadCellResults function is well-implementedThe
downloadCellResultsfunction efficiently processes cell results and generates downloadable URLs. It properly handles undefined input and uses async/await with Promise.all for concurrent processing, which is a good practice for performance.
1-141: Overall assessment: Good implementation with minor improvements neededThe sandbox controller implementation is generally well-structured and follows good practices. However, there are two main areas for improvement:
- Fix the type inconsistency in the
CodeArtifacttype for thecodeproperty.- Replace the
forEachloop with afor...ofloop when dealing with async operations.Addressing these issues will improve the robustness and reliability of the code. The rest of the implementation, including error handling, type definitions, and the
downloadCellResultsfunction, is well done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (5)
24-28: LGTM with a minor suggestion for improvement.The function correctly checks if the last message is from the user. However, consider simplifying the logic to avoid potential issues with empty arrays:
export function isValidMessages(messages: Message[]): boolean { return messages.length > 0 && messages[messages.length - 1].role === "user"; }This change combines the existence check and the role check in a more concise manner.
Line range hint
30-50: LGTM with a suggestion for further improvement.The changes to
retrieveDocumentIdsare good. The function now works directly with messages and uses destructuring for better readability. To further improve the code, consider usingflatMapto simplify the nested loops:export function retrieveDocumentIds(messages: Message[]): string[] { const annotations = getAllAnnotations(messages); return annotations .filter(({ type, data }) => type === "document_file" && "files" in data && Array.isArray(data.files) ) .flatMap(({ data }) => (data.files as DocumentFile[]) .filter(file => Array.isArray(file.content.value)) .flatMap(file => file.content.value as string[]) ); }This approach reduces nesting and makes the code more declarative.
56-65: LGTM with a suggestion for error handling.The function correctly retrieves the content from the last message and integrates other functions. To improve robustness, consider adding error handling:
export function retrieveMessageContent(messages: Message[]): MessageContent { if (messages.length === 0) { throw new Error("No messages provided"); } const userMessage = messages[messages.length - 1]; if (userMessage.role !== "user") { throw new Error("Last message is not from user"); } return [ { type: "text", text: userMessage.content }, ...retrieveLatestArtifact(messages), ...convertAnnotations(messages), ]; }This change ensures that the function behaves predictably with invalid inputs.
77-105: LGTM with suggestions for improvement.The
retrieveLatestArtifactfunction correctly retrieves the latest artifact. However, consider the following improvements:
- Simplify type checking using TypeScript's type guards:
interface ToolCall { name: string; } interface ToolOutput { output?: { code?: string }; } function isToolAnnotation(annotation: Annotation): annotation is Annotation & { data: { toolCall: ToolCall; toolOutput: ToolOutput } } { return ( annotation.type === "tools" && "toolCall" in annotation.data && "toolOutput" in annotation.data && typeof annotation.data.toolCall === "object" && typeof annotation.data.toolOutput === "object" && annotation.data.toolCall !== null && annotation.data.toolOutput !== null ); } function retrieveLatestArtifact(messages: Message[]): MessageContentDetail[] { const annotations = getAllAnnotations(messages); const latestArtifact = annotations.reverse().find(annotation => isToolAnnotation(annotation) && annotation.data.toolCall.name === "artifact" ); if (latestArtifact && isToolAnnotation(latestArtifact)) { const { code } = latestArtifact.data.toolOutput.output ?? {}; if (code) { return [ { type: "text", text: `The existing code is:\n\`\`\`\n${code}\n\`\`\``, }, ]; } } return []; }This approach improves type safety and readability.
- Consider adding a limit to the number of annotations processed to prevent potential performance issues with very large message histories.
107-115: LGTM with a suggestion for improvement.The
convertAnnotationsfunction now correctly processes annotations from all user messages. To improve robustness and readability, consider refactoring as follows:function convertAnnotations(messages: Message[]): MessageContentDetail[] { const userMessagesWithAnnotations = messages .filter(message => message.role === "user" && message.annotations) .flatMap(message => message.annotations?.map(getValidAnnotation) ?? []); if (userMessagesWithAnnotations.length === 0) return []; return processAnnotations(userMessagesWithAnnotations); } function processAnnotations(annotations: Annotation[]): MessageContentDetail[] { // Existing logic for processing annotations // ... }This refactoring separates the concerns of finding annotations and processing them, making the code more modular and easier to maintain.
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/code-generator.ts (2)
1-37: LGTM! Consider enhancing readability of the prompt constant.The imports and the
CODE_GENERATION_PROMPTconstant are well-defined and appropriate for the intended functionality. The prompt provides clear instructions for artifact generation with multiple templates, which adds flexibility to the code generation process.To improve readability, consider breaking down the
CODE_GENERATION_PROMPTinto smaller constants for each template and the JSON format instructions. This would make the code more maintainable and easier to update in the future. For example:const CODE_INTERPRETER_TEMPLATE = `1. code-interpreter-multilang: "Runs code as a Jupyter notebook cell. ...`; const NEXTJS_TEMPLATE = `2. nextjs-developer: "A Next.js 13+ app that reloads automatically. ...`; // ... other templates ... const JSON_FORMAT_INSTRUCTIONS = `Provide detail information about the artifact you're about to generate in the following JSON format with the following keys: ...`; const CODE_GENERATION_PROMPT = `You are a skilled software engineer. You do not make mistakes. Generate an artifact. You can install additional dependencies. You can use one of the following templates:\n\n${CODE_INTERPRETER_TEMPLATE}\n\n${NEXTJS_TEMPLATE}\n\n...\n\n${JSON_FORMAT_INSTRUCTIONS}`;This approach would make it easier to maintain and update individual templates or instructions without affecting the entire prompt.
62-81: LGTM! Consider enhancing consistency in parameter descriptions.The
DEFAULT_META_DATAconstant is well-defined and provides clear instructions for tool usage. The parameters schema correctly defines the required and optional fields.For consistency, consider updating the description of the
oldCodeparameter to match the style of therequirementparameter description. For example:oldCode: { type: "string", description: "The existing code to be modified.", nullable: true, },This small change would make the parameter descriptions more uniform throughout the metadata.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- helpers/tools.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/code-generator.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (4 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/code-generator.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
templates/components/llamaindex/typescript/streaming/annotations.ts (2)
68-74: LGTM!The
getAllAnnotationsfunction is well-implemented. It efficiently collects annotations from all messages usingflatMapand handles potential undefined values with optional chaining. No changes are needed.
Line range hint
1-180: Overall assessment: Good improvements with room for further refinement.The changes in this file generally improve the functionality and readability of the code. The new functions and updates to existing ones enhance the handling of messages and annotations. However, there are still some areas where further improvements can be made:
- Error handling: Consider adding more robust error handling, especially for edge cases and invalid inputs.
- Type safety: Utilize TypeScript's type system more effectively to improve type safety and reduce the need for runtime type checks.
- Performance: Be mindful of potential performance issues, especially when dealing with large message histories.
- Code organization: Consider further modularizing the code to improve maintainability and testability.
These suggestions, along with the specific recommendations provided in the individual review comments, will help to further enhance the quality and robustness of the code.
templates/components/engines/typescript/agent/tools/code-generator.ts (3)
39-61: Well-structured type definitions.The type definitions for
CodeArtifact,CodeGeneratorParameter, andCodeGeneratorToolParamsare comprehensive and well-structured. They cover all necessary aspects of the code generation process and provide flexibility with optional fields.
83-88: Well-implemented CodeGeneratorTool class and constructor.The
CodeGeneratorToolclass correctly implements theBaseToolinterface, and the constructor properly initializes the metadata with either the provided values or the default metadata. This implementation allows for flexibility in tool configuration while maintaining a consistent structure.
1-129: Overall well-implemented CodeGeneratorTool with room for enhancements.The
CodeGeneratorToolimplementation is well-structured and provides a solid foundation for generating code artifacts using LLM. The code demonstrates good practices in TypeScript, including proper type definitions, clear constant declarations, and a well-organized class structure.Key strengths:
- Comprehensive type definitions for artifacts and parameters.
- Well-structured prompt for code generation with multiple templates.
- Proper implementation of the BaseTool interface.
Areas for improvement:
- Enhance error handling and provide more informative error responses in the
callmethod.- Implement more robust JSON parsing and validation in the
generateArtifactmethod.- Improve error logging to avoid potential security issues.
- Consider breaking down the
CODE_GENERATION_PROMPTinto smaller, more manageable constants.Addressing these points will significantly improve the tool's robustness, maintainability, and security. Overall, this is a solid implementation that, with the suggested enhancements, will provide a reliable and flexible code generation tool.
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/chat.controller.ts (2)
Line range hint
52-60: Handle potential errors in asynchronousgenerateNextQuestionsIn the
onFinalcallback, the promise returned bygenerateNextQuestions(chatHistory)might reject if an error occurs. To prevent unhandled promise rejections, add error handling to the promise chain.Consider modifying the code as follows to catch and log any errors:
generateNextQuestions(chatHistory) .then((questions: string[]) => { if (questions.length > 0) { vercelStreamData.appendMessageAnnotation({ type: "suggested_questions", data: questions, }); } }) + .catch((error) => { + console.error("Error generating next questions:", error); + }) .finally(() => { vercelStreamData.close(); });
Line range hint
14-63: Consider optimizing the error handling structureThe
try...catchblock is appropriately used for error handling. However, thefinallyblock does not perform any cleanup actions since the stream timeout cleanup has been removed. Ensure that any necessary cleanup is handled elsewhere or remove thefinallyblock if it's no longer needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- helpers/env-variables.ts (0 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/chat.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- helpers/env-variables.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/sandbox.controller.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/chat.controller.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx (3)
194-235: LGTM: RunTimeError component is well-implemented.The RunTimeError component is well-structured, providing clear error information in a collapsible format. The copy-to-clipboard functionality is a nice touch for user convenience.
297-332: LGTM: ArtifactLogs component is well-implemented.The ArtifactLogs component is well-structured, providing a clear separation between stdout and stderr logs in collapsible sections. This implementation offers a good user experience for reviewing logs.
346-349: LGTM: isImageFile function is well-implemented.The isImageFile function is concise and effective in checking for image file extensions. It's a good example of a utility function that enhances code readability and maintainability.
templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/chat.controller.ts (4)
1-10: Imports are well-organized and necessary dependencies are includedThe import statements correctly include all necessary modules and functions. The addition of
retrieveMessageContentandretrieveDocumentIdsaligns with the updated logic in the code.
18-21: Proper validation of messages with appropriate error handlingThe use of
isValidMessages(messages)ensures that the incoming messages are validated correctly. Returning a400status with a clear error message provides good feedback to the client when the validation fails.
30-31: EnsureretrieveMessageContentextracts the correct user messageVerify that
retrieveMessageContent(messages)accurately retrieves the content from the user's message, especially when messages may have varying structures or formats.To confirm this, review the implementation of
retrieveMessageContent:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check how `retrieveMessageContent` processes the messages array. fd 'retrieveMessageContent.ts' | xargs grep -A 20 'function retrieveMessageContent'
25-27: ConfirmretrieveDocumentIdshandles messages without annotationsWhen retrieving document IDs from the messages, ensure that
retrieveDocumentIds(messages)can handle cases where messages may lack annotations. This will prevent potential errors if some messages do not include document IDs.You can verify if
retrieveDocumentIdssafely handles such cases by inspecting its implementation:
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/app/components/ui/chat/widgets/Artifact.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ArtifactToolfor managing and manipulating software artifacts.CodeGeneratorToolfor generating code artifacts based on user-defined requirements.Bug Fixes
@e2b/code-interpreterpackage to improve stability.@radix-ui/react-tabsfor improved tab functionality.Documentation
STREAM_TIMEOUTenvironment variable to simplify configuration.