feat: Add multi-agent financial report use case for TS #394
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: e470a34 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several significant changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing multi-agent functionalities in the template installation process and the creation of specialized agents for financial report generation. Key modifications include the addition of an Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
questions/simple.ts (1)
50-62: Consider documenting language-specific requirements for financial report agents.The removal of language restrictions for financial report agents represents a significant architectural change. Since this template uses specialized tools and requires GPT-4, consider:
- Documenting any language-specific setup requirements
- Adding validation for language-specific dependencies
- Ensuring consistent behavior across both language implementations
templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/factory.ts (2)
15-15: Remove unused constantMAX_ATTEMPTSThe
MAX_ATTEMPTSconstant is declared but not used in the code. Consider removing it to keep the code clean.
69-69: Redundantawaitinreturn await run;In an async function, using
return await run;is redundant. You can simplify it toreturn run;for cleaner code.Apply this diff to simplify the return statement:
- return await run; + return run;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- helpers/typescript.ts (3 hunks)
- questions/simple.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/agents.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/factory.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/tools.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/nextjs/package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/agents.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/factory.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/tools.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/nextjs/package.json (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
templates/types/streaming/nextjs/package.json (1)
29-29: LGTM! Clean dependency management.The consolidation of LlamaIndex dependencies and version update aligns well with the multi-agent feature addition.
questions/simple.ts (2)
50-62: Verify template support for both languages with financial report agents.The language selection prompt is now shown for financial report agents, implying support for both Python (FastAPI) and TypeScript (NextJS). Let's verify this assumption.
✅ Verification successful
Language selection prompt change is correctly implemented
The codebase has template support for financial report agents in both languages:
- Python implementation at
templates/components/agents/python/financial_report/- TypeScript implementation at
templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/The removal of the conditional check for language selection is appropriate as both implementations are available, allowing users to choose their preferred language stack.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that financial report agent templates exist for both languages echo "Checking for TypeScript financial report agent template..." fd -t f "agents.ts" -p "templates/.*typescript/financial_report" echo "Checking for Python financial report agent template..." fd -t f "agents.py" -p "templates/.*fastapi/financial_report"Length of output: 623
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first find the template directories echo "Finding template directories..." fd -t d "templates" echo -e "\nSearching for financial report related files in templates..." fd . "templates" | grep -i "financial" echo -e "\nSearching for agent files in templates..." fd "agents\.(ts|py)" "templates"Length of output: 1519
Line range hint
236-236: Clarify frontend availability for NextJS financial report agents.The code forces
frontend: falsewhen using NextJS, even though the financial report agent configuration specifiesfrontend: true. This might lead to confusion about UI availability in the NextJS implementation.helpers/typescript.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import addition is appropriate.The addition of the
redcolor import supports the new error handling for missing agents.
147-151: Verify potential file overwrites in workflow directory.The agent files are being copied to the same
workflowdirectory that was used earlier for copying workflow files. This could potentially overwrite previously copied files.Let's check for potential conflicts:
#!/bin/bash # Compare contents of workflow and agent directories echo "Workflow files:" fd . templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow echo -e "\nAgent files:" fd . templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_reporttemplates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/agents.ts (2)
34-39: Verify handling when 'tools' is emptyIn
createAnalyst, iftoolsis empty, the agent proceeds without theinterpretertool. Is this intentional?If the
interpretertool is essential for visualizations, consider handling the case when it's not available. You might adjust the system prompt or inform the user.
48-58: Verify handling when 'tools' is emptyIn
createReporter, iftoolsis empty, the agent proceeds without thedocument_generatortool. Is this intended?If generating an HTML file is a key feature, consider handling the scenario when the
document_generatortool is unavailable, perhaps by modifying the system prompt accordingly.templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/factory.ts (1)
65-67:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the correctness of
event.data instanceof AgentRunEventEnsure that
event.datais the correct property to check for an instance ofAgentRunEvent. Ifeventitself should be an instance ofAgentRunEvent, adjust the condition accordingly.
| export const getQueryEngineTools = async ( | ||
| params?: any, | ||
| ): Promise<QueryEngineTool[] | null> => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Define a specific type instead of using 'any' for 'params'
Using any for the params parameter reduces type safety and can lead to potential bugs. Consider defining a specific type or interface for params to enhance type checking and maintainability.
| } else { | ||
| return [ | ||
| new QueryEngineTool({ | ||
| queryEngine: (index as any).asQueryEngine({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using 'as any' with type assertions
Using as any bypasses TypeScript's type checking and can mask potential issues. Instead, refine the type of index or update type definitions so that index includes the asQueryEngine method. This will enhance type safety and maintainability.
templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/agents.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/agents.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.changeset/little-jars-vanish.md (1)
1-5: Enhance the changeset description with more details.The current description is quite brief. Consider expanding it to include:
- Overview of the multi-agent system's purpose
- Key agents involved (researcher, analyst, reporter)
- Main functionality and workflow
- Any setup requirements or dependencies
Example:
--- "create-llama": patch --- -Add multi-agent financial report for Typescript +Add multi-agent financial report system for TypeScript + +This patch introduces a new multi-agent system for processing financial reports: +- Adds specialized agents: researcher, analyst, and reporter +- Implements workflow orchestration for financial data processing +- Enhances template installation with agent-specific logic +- Provides TypeScript-specific implementation and type safetytemplates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/single-agent.ts (1)
185-187: LGTM! Consider enhancing error logging further.The addition of tool name context to error messages is a good improvement for debugging.
Consider these optional enhancements to make debugging even more effective:
error: (...args: unknown[]) => { - console.error(`[Tool ${call.name} Error]:`, ...args); + console.error( + JSON.stringify({ + timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), + level: 'ERROR', + tool: call.name, + details: args + }) + ); },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- .changeset/little-jars-vanish.md (1 hunks)
- templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/agents.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/single-agent.ts (1 hunks)
- templates/types/streaming/express/package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- templates/components/agents/typescript/financial_report/agents.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
templates/components/multiagent/typescript/workflow/single-agent.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.templates/types/streaming/express/package.json (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
templates/types/streaming/express/package.json (2)
Line range hint
23-31: New dependencies align with multi-agent functionalityThe addition of dependencies like
@e2b/code-interpreter,swagger-parser,marked, andgotaligns well with building a multi-agent system that can process various types of data and execute code. This is a good foundation for the financial report use case.
23-23: Verify compatibility with llamaindex v0.7.10The significant version bump of llamaindex (0.6.x → 0.7.x) might introduce breaking changes. Please ensure that the new version is compatible with the multi-agent functionality being added.
Let's verify the changes:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the multi-agent functionality and llamaindex usage in the Express template.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
The llamaindex update appears compatible with the codebase
The codebase shows consistent usage of the main
llamaindexpackage without any dependencies on@llamaindex/core. The Express template uses standard llamaindex features (ChatMessage, Settings, SimpleChatEngine, etc.) that are all available in the main package. The removal of@llamaindex/coreand update to llamaindex v0.7.10 aligns with the codebase structure.
- All imports are from the main
llamaindexpackage- No references to
@llamaindex/corewere found- The used features (ChatMessage, Settings, SimpleChatEngine, LLamaCloudFileService) are core functionalities that persist across versions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for breaking changes and multi-agent support # Test 1: Look for migration guides or breaking changes rg -A 5 "BREAKING CHANGES|MIGRATION|0.7" README.md CHANGELOG.md # Test 2: Verify multi-agent related imports still work ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "llamaindex"'Length of output: 3749
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Express template's specific usage of llamaindex rg -l "llamaindex" templates/types/streaming/express/src/ rg -A 5 "from \"llamaindex\"" templates/types/streaming/express/src/ # Check if there are any references to @llamaindex/core rg "@llamaindex/core" templates/types/streaming/express/ # Look for any migration guides in the Express template fd README.md templates/types/streaming/express/ --exec cat {}Length of output: 3961
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
createResearcher,createAnalyst, andcreateReporter.Improvements
Dependency Updates
@llamaindex/coreand updatedllamaindexpackage version from0.6.22to0.7.10.