Skip to content

De-dup common code from ExternalCrate methods #142720

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yotamofek
Copy link
Contributor

Also, return an impl Iterator instead of collecting into a Vec. Not sure if that'll have a measurable perf impact, but I think this PR still cleans up the two methods it touches quite nicely.

(I'm having trouble finding a name for the common method I extracted, currently called foobar, would love suggestions!)

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 19, 2025

r? @notriddle

rustbot has assigned @notriddle.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 19, 2025
@yotamofek yotamofek force-pushed the pr/rustdoc/ext-crate-cleanup branch from 05b2698 to 203bbe1 Compare June 19, 2025 14:11
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@bors2 try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Jun 19, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 203bbe1 with merge df0a357

To cancel the try build, run the command @bors2 try cancel.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2025
De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods

<!-- homu-ignore:start -->
<!--
If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort,
please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related
tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this.

This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like
a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using

    r? <reviewer name>
-->
<!-- homu-ignore:end -->
Also, return an `impl Iterator` instead of collecting into a `Vec`. Not sure if that'll have a measurable perf impact, but I think this PR still cleans up the two methods it touches quite nicely.

(I'm having trouble finding a name for the common method I extracted, currently called `foobar`, would love suggestions!)
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 19, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@yotamofek yotamofek force-pushed the pr/rustdoc/ext-crate-cleanup branch from 203bbe1 to aca0688 Compare June 19, 2025 14:25
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@bors2 try cancel

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Try build cancelled. Cancelled workflows:

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@bors2 try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2025
De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods

<!-- homu-ignore:start -->
<!--
If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort,
please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related
tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this.

This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like
a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using

    r? <reviewer name>
-->
<!-- homu-ignore:end -->
Also, return an `impl Iterator` instead of collecting into a `Vec`. Not sure if that'll have a measurable perf impact, but I think this PR still cleans up the two methods it touches quite nicely.

(I'm having trouble finding a name for the common method I extracted, currently called `foobar`, would love suggestions!)
@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Jun 19, 2025

⌛ Trying commit aca0688 with merge 4328207

To cancel the try build, run the command @bors2 try cancel.

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Jun 19, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 4328207 (43282071d47981a2bb3732840c437b432b410909, parent: 2fcf1776b9ccef89993dfe40e9f5c4908e2d2d48)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4328207): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.3% [-0.3%, -0.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.0%, secondary -4.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.0% [-2.0%, -2.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.6% [-4.6%, -4.6%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.0% [-2.0%, -2.0%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary 5.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
5.1% [5.1%, 5.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 692.244s -> 691.619s (-0.09%)
Artifact size: 371.99 MiB -> 371.98 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 20, 2025
@yotamofek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Secondary improvement is spurious (it's for the opt profile), so perf is neutral, unsurprisingly.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

So all good, thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 20, 2025

📌 Commit aca0688 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 20, 2025
Kobzol added a commit to Kobzol/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
…anup, r=GuillaumeGomez

De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods

Also, return an `impl Iterator` instead of collecting into a `Vec`. Not sure if that'll have a measurable perf impact, but I think this PR still cleans up the two methods it touches quite nicely.

(I'm having trouble finding a name for the common method I extracted, currently called `foobar`, would love suggestions!)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #142478 (install docs for each target in different directory)
 - #142629 (Add config builder for bootstrap tests)
 - #142715 (correct template for `#[align]` attribute)
 - #142720 (De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods)
 - #142736 (add issue template for rustdoc)
 - #142743 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
 - #142744 (Add a mailmap entry for y21)
 - #142758 (Make sure to rebuild rustdoc if `src/rustdoc-json-types` is changed)
 - #142764 (Convert `ilog(10)` to `ilog10()`)
 - #142767 (Some symbol and PathRoot cleanups)
 - #142769 (remove equivalent new method on context)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Kobzol added a commit to Kobzol/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
…anup, r=GuillaumeGomez

De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods

Also, return an `impl Iterator` instead of collecting into a `Vec`. Not sure if that'll have a measurable perf impact, but I think this PR still cleans up the two methods it touches quite nicely.

(I'm having trouble finding a name for the common method I extracted, currently called `foobar`, would love suggestions!)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #142629 (Add config builder for bootstrap tests)
 - #142715 (correct template for `#[align]` attribute)
 - #142720 (De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods)
 - #142736 (add issue template for rustdoc)
 - #142743 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
 - #142744 (Add a mailmap entry for y21)
 - #142758 (Make sure to rebuild rustdoc if `src/rustdoc-json-types` is changed)
 - #142764 (Convert `ilog(10)` to `ilog10()`)
 - #142767 (Some symbol and PathRoot cleanups)
 - #142769 (remove equivalent new method on context)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants