-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
allow reuse of cached provisional memos within the same cycle iteration #786
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2a2872b
test for caching provisional values
carljm 9376fcf
add iteration-count to cycle heads
carljm 1cce019
CycleHeads insert/extend checks iteration count match
carljm fa4d0c6
update iteration count in cycle heads
carljm a667a7d
all tests passing
carljm 651794e
remove debug prints
carljm 759d97d
just walk active query stack once
carljm cb59c6e
switch to tracking active cycle iterations on ZalsaLocal
carljm a1341e6
Revert "switch to tracking active cycle iterations on ZalsaLocal"
carljm f039784
Revert "just walk active query stack once"
carljm 3cb19ee
make ActiveQuery::iteration_count private with accessor
carljm 36b74a6
iterate active query stack in reverse
carljm 05bbbd3
use tracing::trace! in hot path
carljm 49ceb84
try a cold annotation on validate_same_iteration
carljm 1d0f7e7
Revert "try a cold annotation on validate_same_iteration"
carljm File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unrelated to this PR (but something I just noticed we could investigate in a separate PR), we could check if using
ThinVec
here might be better than aBox<Vec<_>>
(I think we have that dep nowadays)