Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update materialised tables #7334

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update materialised tables #7334

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

vanand17
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

Currently, it is not clear what amount of historical data is available in materialised tables in our public docs

Merge timing

  • ASAP once approved?

Related issues (optional)

NA

@jacobwsmith19 jacobwsmith19 marked this pull request as ready for review January 31, 2025 13:55
@jacobwsmith19 jacobwsmith19 requested a review from pwseg as a code owner January 31, 2025 13:55
@@ -266,6 +266,9 @@ With Profiles Sync, you can access the following three tables that Segment mater

These materialized tables provide a snapshot of your Segment profiles, batch updated according to your sync schedule.

> success ""
> Materialised view tables will have two months of historical data on backfill.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vanand17 Can you clarify what this means?

Does it mean that we only store two months of data at any time? So if a user checks the table today, they'll only see data going back 60 days, and no further?

Or does it mean that the backfill process only retrieves two months of historical data when it first runs? In other words, if someone sets up Profiles Sync today, the system would pull in the last 60 days of data, and from that point forward, it would keep accumulating new data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants