Skip to content

chore: test changes in testing framework in main branch of snakemake #143

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

johanneskoester
Copy link
Contributor

@johanneskoester johanneskoester commented Sep 7, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the dependency for the Snakemake package to pull the latest version directly from its GitHub repository, enabling access to the most recent features and fixes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The change involves updating the dependency declaration for the snakemake package in the pyproject.toml file. The original version specified a version constraint, while the updated declaration now references the package directly from its GitHub repository. This modification shifts the source of the snakemake package from a version-based dependency to a direct link to the source code.

Changes

Files Change Summary
pyproject.toml Updated snakemake dependency from version ^8.20.0 to a Git repository reference (git="https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake").

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant System
    participant GitHub

    User->>System: Request to install snakemake
    System->>GitHub: Fetch latest snakemake version
    GitHub-->>System: Provide latest snakemake code
    System-->>User: Install snakemake from GitHub
Loading

Poem

🐰 In the garden where I hop and play,
A change has come to brighten the day.
From versions old, we now take flight,
To GitHub's charm, oh what a sight!
With snakemake fresh, we’ll dance and twirl,
A joyful leap in our coding world! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between edadd3e and e5c2b4e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
pyproject.toml (1)

28-28: Consider the implications of sourcing snakemake directly from its Git repository.

Switching the snakemake dependency from a version constraint to a direct Git repository link allows for the use of the latest commits, potentially accessing features or fixes not yet released. However, this change can introduce risks:

  • Instability: The main branch may not always be stable, potentially introducing breaking changes or bugs.
  • Reproducibility: Builds may vary over time without a locked version, making it harder to reproduce issues or ensure consistent behavior across environments.

Consider using a more stable branch or tagging a specific commit in the Git repository to mitigate these risks:

snakemake = { git="https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake", branch="stable" }

or

snakemake = { git="https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake", rev="a1b2c3d" }

@johanneskoester
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, works again with the main branch. Fixes are now released in snakemake 8.20.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant