chore(main): release 1.1.0 #236

snakemake-bot · 2025-03-13T15:53:16Z

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

1.1.0 (2025-03-14)

Features

tolerant status checks (#232) (cb20135)

Bug Fixes

trying syntax fix (#235) (5e591ae)

Documentation

rewrite of the documentation (#219) (7d0b44c)

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Introduced tolerant status checks to improve functionality.
Bug Fixes
- Resolved a syntax issue.
Documentation
- Rewrote documentation for enhanced clarity.
Chores
- Updated the release version to 1.1.0.

coderabbitai · 2025-03-13T15:53:24Z

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new version section in the CHANGELOG.md for version 1.1.0, which includes entries for features, bug fixes, and documentation updates, all with associated issue and commit references. Additionally, the project version in pyproject.toml was updated from 1.0.1 to 1.1.0 to reflect the new release. All modifications were additions, with no deletions.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
`CHANGELOG.md`	Added new section for version `1.1.0` including a feature entry for tolerant status checks referencing issue [#232] and commit [`cb20135`], a bug fix entry for syntax referencing issue [#235] and commit [`5e591ae`], and a documentation rewrite entry with reference to issue [#219] and commit [`7d0b44c`].
`pyproject.toml`	Updated version number from `1.0.1` to `1.1.0` to match the latest release.

Possibly related PRs

docs: rewrite of the documentation #219: Directly related to the current changes by focusing on the documentation rewrite and overall version update.

Suggested labels

autorelease: tagged

Suggested reviewers

cmeesters

Poem

I'm a little rabbit with a hop and a cheer,
Celebrating updates that now appear.
New version notes all lined in a row,
With documentation rewritten to glow.
Hopping along with versions so fine,
In a world where changes gracefully shine!
🐰✨

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)

We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
- To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

CHANGELOG.md (2)

6-8: Clarify the Bug Fix Entry.
The entry “* trying syntax fix” could be rephrased for clarity and grammatical consistency. Consider changing it to something like “* fixed syntax error (#235) (5e591ae)” to clearly indicate that the syntax issue has been resolved.

🧰 Tools

🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~8-~8: There seems to be a noun/verb agreement error. Did you mean “fixes” or “fixed”?
Context: ...03-13) ### Bug Fixes * trying syntax fix ([#235](https://github.com/snakemake/sn...

(SINGULAR_NOUN_VERB_AGREEMENT)

11-13: Enhance the Documentation Entry Description.
The documentation update entry “* rewrite of the documentation” is acceptable, but you might consider providing a bit more detail on what was rewritten or improved. This additional context can help users understand the impact of the documentation changes.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8bdb2a0 and b453daf.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
pyproject.toml (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

pyproject.toml

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 LanguageTool

CHANGELOG.md

[grammar] ~8-~8: There seems to be a noun/verb agreement error. Did you mean “fixes” or “fixed”?
Context: ...03-13) ### Bug Fixes * trying syntax fix ([#235](https://github.com/snakemake/sn...

(SINGULAR_NOUN_VERB_AGREEMENT)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

GitHub Check: testing

🔇 Additional comments (1)

CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-4: Version Header Looks Correct.
The new version header for 1.0.2 is well-formatted with the correct release date and comparison link.

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

CHANGELOG.md (1)
11-14: Consider Rewording the Bug Fix Description for Clarity
The phrase "* trying syntax fix" may be grammatically unclear. Consider rephrasing it to something like "* fixed syntax error" to improve clarity and maintain consistency with the changelog’s tone.

Below is a suggested diff for this entry:
-* trying syntax fix ([#235](https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake-executor-plugin-slurm/issues/235)) ([5e591ae](https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake-executor-plugin-slurm/commit/5e591aee3a9489f33c67f79c67473244263c8673))
+* fixed syntax error ([#235](https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake-executor-plugin-slurm/issues/235)) ([5e591ae](https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake-executor-plugin-slurm/commit/5e591aee3a9489f33c67f79c67473244263c8673))
🧰 Tools

🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~13-~13: There seems to be a noun/verb agreement error. Did you mean “fixes” or “fixed”?
Context: ...d256)) ### Bug Fixes * trying syntax fix ([#235](https://github.com/snakemake/sn...

(SINGULAR_NOUN_VERB_AGREEMENT)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b453daf and 39434f2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
pyproject.toml (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

pyproject.toml

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 LanguageTool

CHANGELOG.md

[grammar] ~13-~13: There seems to be a noun/verb agreement error. Did you mean “fixes” or “fixed”?
Context: ...d256)) ### Bug Fixes * trying syntax fix ([#235](https://github.com/snakemake/sn...

(SINGULAR_NOUN_VERB_AGREEMENT)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

GitHub Check: testing

🔇 Additional comments (3)

CHANGELOG.md (3)

3-4: Release Entry for Version 1.1.0 is Correctly Formatted
The new version header is clearly defined with the correct comparison link and release date.

6-9: Feature Entry for Tolerant Status Checks Looks Good
The entry accurately describes the new feature with a direct reference to issue [#232] and the corresponding commit. No changes needed.

16-19: Documentation Update Entry is Clear and Concise
The entry for the documentation rewrite is well presented and includes the relevant issue and commit references.

snakemake-bot · 2025-03-14T21:24:26Z

🤖 Created releases:

v1.1.0

🌻

snakemake-bot added the autorelease: pending label Mar 13, 2025

snakemake-bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main branch from 8bdb2a0 to b453daf Compare March 13, 2025 16:28

coderabbitai bot reviewed Mar 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

chore(main): release 1.1.0

39434f2

snakemake-bot changed the title ~~chore(main): release 1.0.2~~ chore(main): release 1.1.0 Mar 14, 2025

snakemake-bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main branch from b453daf to 39434f2 Compare March 14, 2025 12:37

coderabbitai bot reviewed Mar 14, 2025

View reviewed changes

johanneskoester merged commit ed403c9 into main Mar 14, 2025
7 checks passed

johanneskoester deleted the release-please--branches--main branch March 14, 2025 21:24

snakemake-bot added autorelease: tagged and removed autorelease: pending labels Mar 14, 2025

This was referenced May 11, 2025

chore(main): release 1.2.3 #264

Merged

chore(main): release 1.2.7 #273

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

chore(main): release 1.1.0 #236

chore(main): release 1.1.0 #236

Uh oh!

snakemake-bot commented Mar 13, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 13, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

snakemake-bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chore(main): release 1.1.0 #236

chore(main): release 1.1.0 #236

Uh oh!

Conversation

snakemake-bot commented Mar 13, 2025 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

1.1.0 (2025-03-14)

Features

Bug Fixes

Documentation

Summary by CodeRabbit

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 13, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Walkthrough

Changes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Suggested reviewers

Poem

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

snakemake-bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

snakemake-bot commented Mar 13, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 13, 2025 •

edited

Loading