Skip to content

chore(main): release 1.2.13 #288

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2025
Merged

Conversation

snakemake-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@snakemake-bot snakemake-bot commented May 16, 2025

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

1.2.13 (2025-05-16)

Bug Fixes


This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the changelog with a new entry for version 1.2.13, including a bug fix reference.
    • Bumped the package version to 1.2.13.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This update adds a new release entry for version 1.2.13 to the changelog and increments the package version in the configuration file. The changes are limited to release documentation and version metadata, with no alterations to code, logic, or public interfaces.

Changes

File(s) Summary of Changes
CHANGELOG.md Added a new entry for version 1.2.13 (2025-05-16) describing a bug fix (#287).
pyproject.toml Incremented the package version from 1.2.12 to 1.2.13.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • cmeesters

Poem

A hop and a skip, the version goes high,
1.2.13 now waves from the sky!
Changelog updated, a bug fix in sight,
No code was disturbed, all calm and light.
🐇✨ Another release, neat and spry!

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-8: Replace placeholder "pr title" with a meaningful description.

The entry

* pr title ([#287](https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake-executor-plugin-slurm/issues/287)) ([a3a548c](...))

uses a generic placeholder rather than a clear summary. Update it to the actual PR title or a concise description of the bug fix to improve readability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3a548c and a37c160.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: cmeesters
PR: snakemake/snakemake-executor-plugin-slurm#193
File: .github/workflows/post_to_mastodon.yml:26-26
Timestamp: 2025-01-20T09:13:26.443Z
Learning: In the snakemake-executor-plugin-slurm repository, release PRs follow the naming pattern "chore(main): release X.Y.Z" where X.Y.Z is the version number.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: testing
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pyproject.toml (2)

3-3: Confirm version bump.

The version has been correctly updated to "1.2.13" in pyproject.toml, matching the release entry in CHANGELOG.md.


3-3: Regenerate and commit poetry.lock.

After bumping the version, please run poetry lock (or poetry update --lock) and commit the updated poetry.lock to ensure dependency resolution stays in sync with the new version.

Comment on lines +3 to +4
## [1.2.13](https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake-executor-plugin-slurm/compare/v1.2.12...v1.2.13) (2025-05-16)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify GitHub compare link.

Ensure the comparison URL resolves successfully:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check HTTP status of the compare URL for v1.2.12...v1.2.13
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake-executor-plugin-slurm/compare/v1.2.12...v1.2.13"

Length of output: 131


Let's verify that both tags exist on GitHub before fixing the link.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# List remote tags and filter for v1.2.12 and v1.2.13
git ls-remote --tags https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake-executor-plugin-slurm.git \
  | grep -E 'v1\.2\.12|v1\.2\.13'

Length of output: 178


Fix broken GitHub compare link in CHANGELOG.md

The compare URL is returning 404 because the v1.2.13 tag hasn’t been pushed to GitHub yet. Please create and push that tag (or update the link once the tag exists) so the comparison resolves correctly.

Locations to update:

  • CHANGELOG.md (Lines 3–4)

Suggested steps:

  1. Locally create the v1.2.13 tag, if not done:
    git tag v1.2.13
  2. Push the tag:
    git push origin v1.2.13
  3. Verify the link now returns HTTP 200:
    curl -o /dev/null -s -w "%{http_code}" \
      https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake-executor-plugin-slurm/compare/v1.2.12...v1.2.13
  4. Confirm CHANGELOG.md’s compare URL resolves successfully.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In CHANGELOG.md around lines 3 to 4, the GitHub compare link for version 1.2.13
is broken because the v1.2.13 tag has not been pushed to the remote repository.
To fix this, locally create the v1.2.13 tag if it doesn't exist, push the tag to
the remote repository, and then verify that the compare URL returns HTTP 200 to
ensure the link resolves correctly.

@cmeesters cmeesters merged commit 38c3233 into main May 16, 2025
6 checks passed
@cmeesters cmeesters deleted the release-please--branches--main branch May 16, 2025 14:03
@snakemake-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

🤖 Created releases:

🌻

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants