Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Several comments refer to GPL-2.0-and-later which should be GPL-2.0-or-later instead #2667

Open
sschuberth opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Several comments refer to GPL-2.0-and-later which should be GPL-2.0-or-later instead #2667

sschuberth opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@sschuberth
Copy link
Member

sschuberth commented Feb 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

See e.g.

license-list-XML/src/exceptions/eCos-exception-2.0.xml

Line 7 in f8acf30

<notes>Typically used with GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-and-later. Similar to Macro and Inlines Functions Exception</notes>

Code search shows at least 10 more occurrences.
@sschuberth sschuberth mentioned this issue Feb 13, 2025
Closed
@swinslow
Copy link
Member

Good eye, @sschuberth. Agree that notes referring to "and" should be replaced with "or" here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sschuberth @swinslow