-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
Support additional image tags #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Also, websites support multiple |
Hey there! I'd be happy to contribute some small improvements if you're interested. As a first idea, I'd like to propose a quick solution to add a very simple image:alt tag. After all, on opg.me they say: "If the page specifies an og:image it should specify og:image:alt.". I would add an additional option ( This would not only increase compliance with opg but might also increase search engine visibility. |
Remaining issues superseded by #53 |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Support for
og:image:width
andog:image:height
would be useful for making images a decent size (possibly with a default, especially on the height one), it would also need testing on whether specifying only one scales the image or stretches it out of proportions.Support for
og:image:type
andog:image:alt
may or may not be useful.Edit: For config, it may or may not be useful to not have the all as separate options, maybe under a dict of
image_options
or something else.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: