Skip to content

feat: add structured output support using Pydantic models #60

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

theagenticguy
Copy link
Collaborator

@theagenticguy theagenticguy commented May 20, 2025

Description

  • Add method to Agent class for handling structured outputs
  • Create structured_output.py utility for converting Pydantic models to tool specs
  • Improve error handling when extracting model_id from configuration
  • Add integration tests to validate structured output functionality

Related Issues

#25

Documentation PR

[Link to related associated PR in the agent-docs repo]

Type of Change

  • New feature

Testing

[How have you tested the change?]

  • hatch fmt --linter
  • hatch fmt --formatter
  • hatch test --all
  • Verify that the changes do not break functionality or introduce warnings in consuming repositories: agents-docs, agents-tools, agents-cli

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or my feature works
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have added an appropriate example to the documentation to outline the feature
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

- Add  method to Agent class for handling structured outputs
- Create structured_output.py utility for converting Pydantic models to tool specs
- Improve error handling when extracting model_id from configuration
- Add integration tests to validate structured output functionality
@theagenticguy theagenticguy marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2025 21:15
@theagenticguy theagenticguy requested a review from a team as a code owner June 8, 2025 21:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants