-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
safeTry should not require .safeUnwrap() #589
safeTry should not require .safeUnwrap() #589
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: da80693 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
8dbc806
to
88ebd46
Compare
eb0e07c
to
c7d58a0
Compare
c7d58a0
to
4d3199c
Compare
4d3199c
to
609b398
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but CI failed again 😢
@m-shaka I missed a |
Resolves #580
edit: Had to bump jest versions for support in using
toBeEqual()
on classes/objects w/[Symbol.itereator]()
and[Symbol.asyncIterator]()
CC: @mattpocock @m-shaka @supermacro