Skip to content

增加了代码撰写机器人 #27

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Formyselfonly
Copy link

基于DeepSeek写代码功能的增强的原因,通过Workflow实现。
Step1.根据需求写出需求说明文档
Step2.根据需求说明文档写代码
Step3.优化代码并修改错误
优点是代码写出来改下导包报错基本就能直接用
image

基于DeepSeek写代码功能的增强
@QuantumAlchemist03
Copy link

Clear Purpose: The agent's role in generating code from prompts is well-defined, aligning with the workflow's objectives.

Modular Design: Encapsulating the agent's functionality within its own DSL file promotes maintainability and scalability.

Integration: The agent is seamlessly integrated into the existing workflow, suggesting thorough testing and validation.

@QuantumAlchemist03
Copy link

The current implementation could be improved in several key areas. Firstly, it lacks explicit error-handling mechanisms, which are essential for managing unexpected inputs or failures during code generation. Implementing try-except blocks or similar constructs would enhance robustness. Additionally, there is no logging present within the agent's operations; integrating logging would allow developers to track the agent’s activity, aiding in debugging and performance monitoring. The pull request also does not include unit tests for the newly added agent, which are crucial for validating functionality and ensuring future changes do not introduce regressions. Lastly, the PR would benefit from more detailed documentation—specifically, setup instructions, usage examples, and configuration options—to help users understand and effectively utilize the new agent.

Copy link

@QuantumAlchemist03 QuantumAlchemist03 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current implementation could be improved in several key areas. Firstly, it lacks explicit error handling mechanisms, which are essential for managing unexpected inputs or failures during code generation. Implementing try-except blocks or similar constructs would enhance robustness. Additionally, there is no logging present within the agent's operations; integrating logging would allow developers to track the agent’s activity, aiding in debugging and performance monitoring. The pull request also does not include unit tests for the newly added agent, which are crucial for validating functionality and ensuring future changes do not introduce regressions. Lastly, the PR would benefit from more detailed documentation—specifically, setup instructions, usage examples, and configuration options—to help users understand and effectively utilize the new agent.

@Formyselfonly
Copy link
Author

The current implementation could be improved in several key areas. Firstly, it lacks explicit error handling mechanisms, which are essential for managing unexpected inputs or failures during code generation. Implementing try-except blocks or similar constructs would enhance robustness. Additionally, there is no logging present within the agent's operations; integrating logging would allow developers to track the agent’s activity, aiding in debugging and performance monitoring. The pull request also does not include unit tests for the newly added agent, which are crucial for validating functionality and ensuring future changes do not introduce regressions. Lastly, the PR would benefit from more detailed documentation—specifically, setup instructions, usage examples, and configuration options—to help users understand and effectively utilize the new agent.

Thank you so much! I would love to make some improvements if I had more time, but I’m currently working on a major project, so I won’t be able to work on it for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants