Skip to content

fix: Allow on_demand_throughput optional values and disabling of table TTL #93

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

magreenbaum
Copy link
Member

Description

Bumping provider version to include some provider bugfixes:

  • Allow table TTL to be disabled by allowing ttl[0].attribute_name to be set when ttl[0].enabled is false
  • Fix validation error when optional attribute in on_demand_throughput is excluded (this bug resulted in both max_read_request_units and max_write_request_units being required to be set when both are optional)

Motivation and Context

Breaking Changes

No.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • I have updated at least one of the examples/* to demonstrate and validate my change(s)
  • I have tested and validated these changes using one or more of the provided examples/* projects
  • I have executed pre-commit run -a on my pull request

@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

I am not sure that we need to merge this one because nothing new or changed there. Provider versions are always set to a minimum, and it is up to users to upgrade them if they want.

@magreenbaum magreenbaum deleted the fix/on_demand_throughput_and_ttl_bugs branch November 27, 2024 22:04
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 30, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants