generated from terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-module-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
feat: add guardrails to DA #282
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
alex-reiff
wants to merge
14
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
guardrails
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+61
−1
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fb0e7f4
feat: add guardrails to DA
alex-reiff 93d033a
fix: variable path
alex-reiff 3243d6b
fix: change defaukt
alex-reiff 06d09d7
fix: add default user to access group
alex-reiff a7b69a3
test: en instance also private
alex-reiff b58f3e5
Merge branch 'main' into guardrails
alex-reiff c7936d9
fix: secret group endpoint type
alex-reiff a7f0d19
fix: secret group endpoint type
alex-reiff bbf7815
Merge branch 'main' into guardrails
alex-reiff c228d9e
Merge branch 'main' into guardrails
alex-reiff b8b088e
test: en instance also private
alex-reiff f04762e
fix: various fixes
alex-reiff 0798c16
fix: variable name
alex-reiff a14e027
fix: variable name
alex-reiff File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -80,6 +80,24 @@ variable "public_engine_enabled" { | |
default = false | ||
} | ||
|
||
variable "default_secret_group_name" { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is confusing - Isn't there a default group out of the box with every newly provisioned instance? Why are we creating another one (and also calling it default) |
||
type = string | ||
description = "Name to give the secrets group automatically created when provisioning a new Secrets Manager instance." | ||
default = "default-group" | ||
} | ||
|
||
variable "default_access_group_name" { | ||
type = string | ||
description = "Name to give the access group automatically created when provisioning a new Secrets Manager instance." | ||
default = "secrets_manager_secret_reader_access_group" | ||
} | ||
|
||
variable "access_group_user_ids" { | ||
type = list(string) | ||
description = "List of IBM IDs to add to the default access group for the new Secrets Manager instance." | ||
default = [] | ||
} | ||
|
||
######################################################################################################################## | ||
# Public cert engine config | ||
######################################################################################################################## | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need a boolean to allow users to opt out of the access group creation if they want