You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been using Elevate for a while and I am wondering about the difference in gain on the Fitness trend between cycling and running activities.
I have the impression that cycling activities make it progress faster than my running activities (in proportion).
For example, for a cycling activity of 3h20 (94 km) HRSS 99 my fitness increases by +3.9, for a running activity 1h04-12.8km) HRSS 49, it increases by +0.7.
I find the difference in proportion significant.
Could this come from my parameter settings (zone settings)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have been using Elevate for a while and I am wondering about the difference in gain on the Fitness trend between cycling and running activities.
I have the impression that cycling activities make it progress faster than my running activities (in proportion).
For example, for a cycling activity of 3h20 (94 km) HRSS 99 my fitness increases by +3.9, for a running activity 1h04-12.8km) HRSS 49, it increases by +0.7.
I find the difference in proportion significant.
Could this come from my parameter settings (zone settings)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: