Skip to content

check when op_low_reserve error #159

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 20, 2025

Conversation

AlaaElattar
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Check when the operation failed due to not having xlms

Changes

List of changes this PR includes

Related Issues

List of related issues

Checklist

  • Tests included
  • Build pass
  • Code format
  • Screenshots/Video attached (needed for UI changes)

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.36%. Comparing base (66b6d64) to head (ec1bc33).
Report is 1 commits behind head on development.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           development     #159   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        62.36%   62.36%           
============================================
  Files               26       26           
  Lines             1201     1201           
============================================
  Hits               749      749           
  Misses             452      452           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@AlaaElattar AlaaElattar merged commit 488ca66 into development May 20, 2025
2 checks passed
@AlaaElattar AlaaElattar deleted the development_check_lowReserve branch May 20, 2025 12:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants