fix: the noises are not initialized in detection_sensor's noise_v2

[xtk8532704]

Description

This PR fix a bug in the PR that the perception noises are not initialized

Abstract

The perception noises are not initialized in the detection_sensor's noise_v2, which results in undefined noise values.

Background

None.

Details

Check the published pose in /localization/kinematic_state:

before:

header:
  stamp:
    sec: 1741165999
    nanosec: 608598102
  frame_id: map
objects:
- existence_probability: 0.0
  classification:
  - label: 3
    probability: 1.0
  kinematics:
    pose_with_covariance:
      pose:
        position:
          x: 1.6319554146606627e+130
          y: 2.8510855737315343e+131
          z: 101.25
        orientation:
          x: 0.0
          y: 0.0
          z: 0.5684897847198799
          w: -0.8226903212443578

after:

---
header:
  stamp:
    sec: 1741168200
    nanosec: 879934861
  frame_id: map
objects:
- existence_probability: 0.0
  classification:
  - label: 3
    probability: 1.0
  kinematics:
    pose_with_covariance:
      pose:
        position:
          x: 117.30633413377262
          y: 289.8219850335379
          z: 101.25
        orientation:
          x: 0.0
          y: 0.0
          z: 0.7342859116860377
          w: 0.6788403346144103

References

None.

Destructive Changes

None.

Known Limitations

None.

[github-actions]

Checklist for reviewers ☑️

All references to "You" in the following text refer to the code reviewer.

• Is this pull request written in a way that is easy to read from a third-party perspective?
• Is there sufficient information (background, purpose, specification, algorithm description, list of disruptive changes, and migration guide) in the description of this pull request?
• If this pull request contains a destructive change, does this pull request contain the migration guide?
• Labels of this pull request are valid?
• All unit tests/integration tests are included in this pull request? If you think adding test cases is unnecessary, please describe why and cross out this line.
• The documentation for this pull request is enough? If you think adding documents for this pull request is unnecessary, please describe why and cross out this line.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
4 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud