-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
B 22015 #14878
Conversation
Marking as ready for review to field thoughts on the potential removal of the upstream |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some the the changes in the main PR made their way into integrationTesting via a different PR that required the same changes. Those diffs were in integration when this backlog item was PO accepted so while it is a little messy this seems fine to me.
Concur that B-21378 doesn't appear to be a upstream the implementation just needs to be able to support calculating RDD for NSRA15 rate areas as well as non NSRA15 rate areas. |
B-22015
Requires B-21473 to be merged first (complete).
This story was also identified as an upstream in order to deconflict work, however this may not be necessary. The implementation just had to support both stories, not necessarily proceed in order.
To elaborate, this pr was merged first with a solution that didn't work well with Paul's upstream, B-21473. This caused issues with this pr, and was brought in line with one another in this pr. The changes in this current PR that are not included in the integration PR can be found in the one just linked. Since then, additional changes have been required for B-21378 such as in this pr, that chronologically occur after the integration PR for 22015. This leads me to think that this is a false upstream that should be removed, and instead just monitored as a risk for merge conflicts. Please let me know any thoughts or opinions on this.
INT PR
Summary
This ticket attempts to add some NSRA15 rate area transit times of 60 for HHG and 30 for UB when calculating the required delivery date when traveling between these areas. These transit times are added to the estimated transit time for the domestic rate area provided to find the correct RDD. Some small backend changes had to be made to allow for shipment types to be selected to determine whether to apply the HHG or UB rate. Also of note, the provided database migration in Agility had to be altered to remove some duplicate values, and to set all of the values to Active so that they may be used in the calculation.
Verification Steps for the Author
These are to be checked by the author.
Verification Steps for Reviewers
These are to be checked by a reviewer.
How to test
NOTE: Make sure the FEATURE_FLAG_UNACCOMPANIED_BAGGAGE is ON and your duty location is OCONUS in order to be able to create a UB shipment
Backend
Database
Any new migrations/schema changes:
Screenshots