-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Move code inside internal directory #102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e375aea
move things to internal
phbnf 3146922
more internal things, and move things to storage
phbnf 4041ebd
move structs around
phbnf defb6c9
update comment
phbnf 61163e2
move testdata to internal
phbnf 8ee5d18
move newLog to internal
phbnf 536496b
add constructor, make fields private
phbnf 37c47ed
more things private
phbnf File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could this go in
scti
too?Similarly, it's creating and returning structs defined in
scti
and looks quite like it's part of that package, and I think you wouldn't need to exportChainValidationOpts
if it were in there since it's really just an internal detail of Log(?)Actually, that'd potentially reduce the size of this PR quite a lot since many of the changed lines are just flipping the case of newly exported structs and fields & references to them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one is a bit harder to move: the Config struct has to be defined somewhere that's visible to external libraries.
Eventually, this options are used to call validateChain(chain, options). I think the right thing to do is to re-architecture the code for it to call methods (see TODO). I'll come to this later. This is specifically cumbersome to do for this one because these options are also used for the getRoots endpoint.... which is already a tricky one to handle with the x509 migration. So one step at a time :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I've done though, is to move the OID and ExtKeyUsage parsing functions to chain_validation.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the meantime, to make this PR easier to digest, I can add a constructor in internal. That will save the PR from all the lowercase-->uppercase changes.