Skip to content

Rename gravity_constant to gravity in the equations constructor #2357

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

patrickersing
Copy link
Contributor

This PR renames the gravity_constant keyword in the equations constructor to gravity and fixes the docstrings/comments to describe this quantity as the gravitational acceleration instead of the gravitational constant. This will make it consistent with the actual field equations.gravity and avoid any confusion between gravitational acceleration and the gravitational constant. See trixi-framework/TrixiShallowWater.jl#82, trixi-framework/TrixiShallowWater.jl#84.

Since this changes the keyword argument for the equations constructor it must be considered a breaking change.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Review checklist

This checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging.

Purpose and scope

  • The PR has a single goal that is clear from the PR title and/or description.
  • All code changes represent a single set of modifications that logically belong together.
  • No more than 500 lines of code are changed or there is no obvious way to split the PR into multiple PRs.

Code quality

  • The code can be understood easily.
  • Newly introduced names for variables etc. are self-descriptive and consistent with existing naming conventions.
  • There are no redundancies that can be removed by simple modularization/refactoring.
  • There are no leftover debug statements or commented code sections.
  • The code adheres to our conventions and style guide, and to the Julia guidelines.

Documentation

  • New functions and types are documented with a docstring or top-level comment.
  • Relevant publications are referenced in docstrings (see example for formatting).
  • Inline comments are used to document longer or unusual code sections.
  • Comments describe intent ("why?") and not just functionality ("what?").
  • If the PR introduces a significant change or new feature, it is documented in NEWS.md with its PR number.

Testing

  • The PR passes all tests.
  • New or modified lines of code are covered by tests.
  • New or modified tests run in less then 10 seconds.

Performance

  • There are no type instabilities or memory allocations in performance-critical parts.
  • If the PR intent is to improve performance, before/after time measurements are posted in the PR.

Verification

  • The correctness of the code was verified using appropriate tests.
  • If new equations/methods are added, a convergence test has been run and the results
    are posted in the PR.

Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.93%. Comparing base (f76ccaf) to head (da986a3).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2357   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.93%   96.93%           
=======================================
  Files         500      500           
  Lines       41499    41499           
=======================================
  Hits        40226    40226           
  Misses       1273     1273           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 96.93% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@DanielDoehring DanielDoehring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Breaking changes should be documented in the News.md :)

@patrickersing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Breaking changes should be documented in the News.md :)

I have now added the respective entry to the News.md in c0b2ba7.

Copy link
Contributor

@DanielDoehring DanielDoehring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok from the technical side, but someone else should give the final verdict here.

Copy link
Member

@andrewwinters5000 andrewwinters5000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! I added this to the list of the PRs for the next breaking release

@andrewwinters5000 andrewwinters5000 mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2025
9 tasks
@ranocha ranocha marked this pull request as draft April 16, 2025 05:28
@ranocha
Copy link
Member

ranocha commented Apr 16, 2025

Thanks. I marked this as a draft so that nobody accidentally merges it before we are prepared for the next breaking release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking consistency Make Michael happy
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants