You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 26, 2021. It is now read-only.
Currently, Kotlin support in stag requires public visibility of setters and getters. This is because internal, private, and protected all prevent stag from seeing the setters and getters. internal should be supported, but cannot until there is a standalone kotlin stag compiler due to the way setter and getter names are created in java code for kotlin.
Proposed Spec
Kotlin fields should be able to reduce visibility of setters and getters to internal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Summary
Currently, Kotlin support in stag requires public visibility of setters and getters. This is because
internal
,private
, andprotected
all prevent stag from seeing the setters and getters.internal
should be supported, but cannot until there is a standalone kotlin stag compiler due to the way setter and getter names are created in java code for kotlin.Proposed Spec
internal
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: