[FIX] FAQ Section Glitches Fixed

[4F24L]

FAQ Section Glitches Fixed

• Fixes [Bug]: FAQ section is messed up #888

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
bobble-ai-rcmb	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 17, 2024 5:19pm

[github-actions]

👋 Thank you for opening this pull request! We're excited to review your contribution. Please give us a moment, and we'll get back to you shortly!

Feel free to join our community on Discord to discuss more!

[github-actions]

🚀 Thank you for your contribution! This pull request has been closed. If you have any questions or need further assistance, feel free to reach out.

[4F24L]

Can you please add at least level 1 to these PRs? As these are the genuine issues that I raised and solved. @MastanSayyad

[MastanSayyad]

Removing comments and some tags + adding few scripts, you gave this level 3 and now asking for level 1 for this

There will be no levels for such PRs, and don't call them genuine contributuons, if they were i would have happily added all labels (and for some PRs I did)

[4F24L]

I wasn't aware of the proper labeling guidelines in this repo, so I initially labeled every small issue as level 2 or 3 as it is done by admin. I now understand the correct approach, and moving forward, I'll contribute according to the rules.

[MastanSayyad]

@4F24L You should let the Project Admin (PA) handle their responsibilities, as it’s their job to add labels. Just think, if every contributor started doing like this, would it be fair to others?

I hope you'll contribute more fairly from now on.

@mansiruhil13 I haven't heard anything from your side yet. Can you please clarify this situation in your repository? Are you aware of what's going on? Have you been active in the Discord PA channel? Are you staying active in your repo?

[4F24L]

@4F24L You should let the Project Admin (PA) handle their responsibilities, as it’s their job to add labels. Just think, if every contributor started doing like this, would it be fair to others?

I hope you'll contribute more fairly from now on.

@MastanSayyad I understand that my actions might seem unfair, but I want to clarify that I wasn't trying to spam or gain scores dishonestly. My intention was to contribute meaningfully, and I followed what I saw in the repository. Most issues were labelled as Level 2 or Level 3, so I did the same without fully understanding the GSSoC rules.

You can check issue #939 titled "NOTICE ⚠️: GSSOC EXtended Program Manager" for more context. I mentioned some of the PRs to explain my reasoning. I realize now that I should have understood the GSSoC criteria better, but I followed the same approach as others PRs that were managed similarly. Moving forward, I will ensure that my contributions align with fair practices and the GSSoC rules.

• fix: navbar alignment issue #666
  

[MastanSayyad]

@4F24L You were not a project admin nor a Mentor, There is no point of were you following what was going on this repo or not

I'm going to reduce all unfair labeling in this project, therefore I asked the admin to speak about such practice. i announce daily on discord about the guidelines and updates to all PAs and Contributors.

[4F24L]

Okay, I will contribute according to the rules from now on. Can I continue contributing to this project, or should I focus on other projects instead?

[MastanSayyad]

@4F24L focus on others, as some contributors caught an eye on your profile so they will label you as a spammer if you keep contributing here