Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle FOs, not mere dissent, after a REC's AC Review #987

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025

Conversation

frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal commented Feb 12, 2025

See #978

The alternative would be to simply remove the paragraph, and rely on the generic text about AC reviews and FOs.

index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
@frivoal frivoal added the Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion label Feb 12, 2025
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process 2024/2025 milestone Feb 12, 2025
@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

frivoal commented Feb 12, 2025

The Process CG choose to use this rephrasing rather than dropping the paragraph, because it looks like dropping the paragraph would have some side effects, like removing the requirement to wait 14 days. It might be worth separately pursuing a refactoring that centralizes this 14 days requirement and lets us get rid of the paragraph, but until then, fixing it seemed more concervative.

@frivoal frivoal merged commit a77d90a into w3c:main Feb 12, 2025
2 checks passed
@frivoal frivoal deleted the rec-after-review branch February 12, 2025 15:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants