Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Architecture (TAG) Review #797

Closed
Tracked by #621
mlagally opened this issue Jul 4, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed
Tracked by #621

Architecture (TAG) Review #797

mlagally opened this issue Jul 4, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor

mlagally commented Jul 4, 2022

Work with TAG to get a review by the architecture architecture group.
https://tag.w3.org/workmode/

See also #621

@mlagally mlagally mentioned this issue Jul 4, 2022
5 tasks
@mlagally mlagally changed the title ArchitectureAsk the TAG for review; see how to work with the TAG. If you are developing javascript APIs you may also want to ask public-script-coord@w3.org, a technical discussion list shared by W3C and ECMA's TC 39. TAG Review Jul 4, 2022
@mlagally mlagally changed the title TAG Review Architecture (TAG) Review Jul 4, 2022
@mlagally mlagally added the review label Jul 4, 2022
@rhiaro
Copy link
Member

rhiaro commented Jul 13, 2022

Hi @mlagally. TAG review was requested a few months ago, and we filed our review on the request issue. It's quite long though. Would you prefer if I split it up into multiple issues on this repo instead, or is it okay for you to work with as it is?

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @rhiaro,
many thanks for your extensive review and constructive feedback.
We will review the entire feedback carefully in today's architecture call, however it would be very useful for us, if you could create several issues, so we can adress them individually and have focused follow-up conversations in these issues.

@rhiaro
Copy link
Member

rhiaro commented Jul 25, 2022

Sorry for the delay, and I note that you had already split out a few of my points of feedback. I've now created issues for the rest, I hope that helps. Thanks again for your work on this.

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor Author

mlagally commented Sep 8, 2022

@rhiaro Thanks for all your review feedback. We have addressed many of them and provided feedback in the individual issues. Others are in work and will take a bit more time, since they depend on implementation reports that are yet to come. The review itself was completed, so I'm closing this issue to avoid confusion or fragmented discussions.

@mlagally mlagally closed this as completed Sep 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants