We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
timeouts
/webdriver/tests/classic/new_session/invalid_capabilities.py
This test checks that the following timeouts configuration objects are rejected when creating a new session:
("timeouts", [ 1, [], "{}", False, {"invalid": 10}, {"PAGELOAD": 10}, {"page load": 10}, {" pageLoad": 10}, {"pageLoad ": 10}, {"pageLoad": None}, {"pageLoad": False}, {"pageLoad": []}, {"pageLoad": "10"}, {"pageLoad": 2.5}, {"pageLoad": -1}, {"pageLoad": 2**53}, {"pageLoad": {"value": 10}}, {"pageLoad": 10, "invalid": 10}, ]),
I had two questions about this data:
{"pageLoad": None}
3. For each key → value in timeouts: 1. If «"script", "pageLoad", "implicit"» does not contain key, then continue.
/webdriver/tests/classic/new_session/timeouts.py seems to have the same issue as (1) above, in that it is expecting null timeout values to be rejected
/webdriver/tests/classic/new_session/timeouts.py
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Implement for me
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
This test checks that the following
timeouts
configuration objects are rejected when creating a new session:I had two questions about this data:
{"pageLoad": None}
should not be rejected. The WebDriver spec now explicitly allows null timeout values. Is this right?https://w3c.github.io/webdriver/#dfn-deserialize-as-timeouts-configuration
/webdriver/tests/classic/new_session/timeouts.py
seems to have the same issue as (1) above, in that it is expecting null timeout values to be rejectedThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: